Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Multi Stage Fracturing (MSF) completion systems have been continuously evolving with the goal of increasing efficiency and providing cost optimized solutions. While utilizing such systems, the primary objective is to drill a horizontal section in the prolific formation and complete the well with a conduit that allows multi stage fracturing either by ball drop sleeves in Open Hole (OH) or Plug&Perf (P&P) technique in cemented environment. A recently introduced third option called Cemented MSF has been discussed in this paper with the pros/cons of this approach and comparison with the aforementioned MSF methods. Decision of a completion type depends on end-user preference based on performance. However, in case of excessive washouts, high doglegs, and up dip drilling directions, OH MSF completion falls into high risk category for deployment due to friction forces arise from placement need of the high number of packers across lengthy formation section. For this reason, converting to cemented liner for conventional P&P operation was recently observed in High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) gas wells as way of mitigating the risk of deploying OH MSF completions. To address the challenges associated with, a proven and promising solution that involves utilizing cement to isolate individual stages and having cementable frac sleeves is being evaluated. This process entails cementing the clusters of ball drop, multi entry, limited entry design frac sleeves and hydraulically activated toe initiator that is operated with absolute pressure along with a landing collar to be functioned using a specialized wiping dart. The implementation of this novel technology wherein frac sleeves are strategically positioned within the lower completion and subsequently cemented in place, adheres to the standard procedure and established deployment practices for cemented liner operations. Therefore, cemented MSF advantages over OH MSF in terms of installation is apparent. Nevertheless, the real benefit of the technology is more pronounced during the rigless fracturing operations, particularly when compared with P&P technique. The overall efficiency assessment indicates notable gains especially with establishing the injection into the first stage by activating toe sleeve before the rig move. Moreover, meeting requirements of 15,000 psi differential pressure and over 300°F temperature rating with enhanced design eliminates any application limitations, expanding the options of completion as fit for purpose approach for HPHT wells. The novelty of this technology is the significant optimization during completion deployment and rig less frac operations without affecting production expectations. Ball drop cemented MSF completion systems is a viable alternative to conventional P&P for limited number of stages via reducing the overall capex and operational costs. In addition, minimizing the overall risk related to perforation guns and the need for multiple rig setups and dismantling during the stimulation phase.
Multi Stage Fracturing (MSF) completion systems have been continuously evolving with the goal of increasing efficiency and providing cost optimized solutions. While utilizing such systems, the primary objective is to drill a horizontal section in the prolific formation and complete the well with a conduit that allows multi stage fracturing either by ball drop sleeves in Open Hole (OH) or Plug&Perf (P&P) technique in cemented environment. A recently introduced third option called Cemented MSF has been discussed in this paper with the pros/cons of this approach and comparison with the aforementioned MSF methods. Decision of a completion type depends on end-user preference based on performance. However, in case of excessive washouts, high doglegs, and up dip drilling directions, OH MSF completion falls into high risk category for deployment due to friction forces arise from placement need of the high number of packers across lengthy formation section. For this reason, converting to cemented liner for conventional P&P operation was recently observed in High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) gas wells as way of mitigating the risk of deploying OH MSF completions. To address the challenges associated with, a proven and promising solution that involves utilizing cement to isolate individual stages and having cementable frac sleeves is being evaluated. This process entails cementing the clusters of ball drop, multi entry, limited entry design frac sleeves and hydraulically activated toe initiator that is operated with absolute pressure along with a landing collar to be functioned using a specialized wiping dart. The implementation of this novel technology wherein frac sleeves are strategically positioned within the lower completion and subsequently cemented in place, adheres to the standard procedure and established deployment practices for cemented liner operations. Therefore, cemented MSF advantages over OH MSF in terms of installation is apparent. Nevertheless, the real benefit of the technology is more pronounced during the rigless fracturing operations, particularly when compared with P&P technique. The overall efficiency assessment indicates notable gains especially with establishing the injection into the first stage by activating toe sleeve before the rig move. Moreover, meeting requirements of 15,000 psi differential pressure and over 300°F temperature rating with enhanced design eliminates any application limitations, expanding the options of completion as fit for purpose approach for HPHT wells. The novelty of this technology is the significant optimization during completion deployment and rig less frac operations without affecting production expectations. Ball drop cemented MSF completion systems is a viable alternative to conventional P&P for limited number of stages via reducing the overall capex and operational costs. In addition, minimizing the overall risk related to perforation guns and the need for multiple rig setups and dismantling during the stimulation phase.
Fracturing in tight and deep gas formations can be challenging when near-wellbore stresses reduce injectivity. The drilling fluid may contribute to a near-wellbore damage, and this will exaggerate the rock breakdown limits additional to the high local stresses. Study was dedicated to understanding the main contributing factors and suggest the comprehensive workflow to minimize occurrence and non-productive time (NPT) associated with abovementioned challenges. Statistical analyses over several years and hundreds fracturing stages were taken as a basis for the study. Wells were divided into several groups including orientation, completion and formation type criteria. Injectivity test was consistently performed prior to the main fracturing operation and was used as a main tool to forecast the severity of the near-wellbore issues. Based on the pressure response during and immediately after the test it was possible to build a decision tree for the next step in fracturing operations. Engineering workflow was further calibrated in the real-field case studies. Results of the study revealed that the most challenging completion scenario in respect to near-wellbore injectivity challenges was a horizontal cemented liner with plug and perf technique. In carbonate formations, up to 30% of the stages experienced injectivity limitation of various severity in several group of wells. Acid squeeze was identified as most reliable an operationally affordable method for carbonate formations. Another effective solution, applicable to clastic rocks too can be a degradable particulate for the abrasive perforation that improves injectivity and leaves a clean wellbore without need for cleanout. Interestingly, largest likelihood of the near wellbore block occurred in the very first stages (toe sections) of the horizontal wellbores and reached up to 50% rate in some categories. Coiled tubing -conveyed perforation and cemented multistage fracturing completions were implemented to servce as a solution to minimize inefficiencies and NPT as well as risks associated with conventional operations utilizing tractors in horizontal wellbores. Implementation of decision tree derived as a result of the study allowed reducing NPT of operator and service company. Considering large number of equipment and personnel involved in such integrated completion and fracturing projects it represents significant value for both quality and HSE aspect and increase efficiency of the operations which is of primary importance when developing tight reservoirs. Study provides large statistical summary and up-to-date practices of deep and tight rocks fracturing and solution from several regions.
Multi Stage Fracturing (MSF) completion technology with a true 15,000 psi pressure rating, Multi-Entry (ME), cementable system was developed for utilization in deep tight gas wells. The new completion system brings operational and design improvements to the MSF methods utilized for these types of wells. This paper discusses the details on the development of the novel system considering harsh well conditions, its multi-entry design for creating multiple fractures across each stage, and improvements compared to the traditional open hole MSF solutions. A detailed review of the requirements for the completion installation, activation, fracturing execution and expected performance metrics will also be covered. The new cemented MSF completion system consists of a cementable hydraulic toe sleeve and cementable fracturing ports. The toe initiator placed in the first stage is opened by applying pressure whereas multiple cementable fracturing ports in the remaining stages are opened by dropping a single size ball in each stage. Zonal isolation relies on cement behind the completion rather than mechanical, swellable or metal expandable packer as in regular Open Hole (OH) MSF systems. To verify the completion system suitability for the target application, a thorough design of the system components and qualification testing were needed. Collaborative approach, clear project scope definition and detailed review of the solution were key factors to ensure final product met expectations. Several wells completed and stimulated successfully with the new ME MSF system will be discussed. It is observed that the slim design, rotatable feature was mitigating the challenges, reducing the overall risk of deployment. In addition, stimulating of stages using a single ball per stage activating multiple sleeves in each stage, except for the first stage which was with cementable hydraulic sleeves, resulted with more efficient fracturing operations by reducing time, resources, and emissions. The 15K cemented ME MSF completion system provided a third MSF option to complete deep tight gas wells in addition to the current two methods of cemented liner and open hole MSF completions. It bridges the gap between the current systems by relying on the cement for zonal isolation and allowing multiple sleeves in each stage, imitating clusters used in Plug&Perf (P&P) operations. The system eliminates isolation packers compared to open hole completions and perforation, plug setting, plug milling when compared to P&P cemented liners technique in which wireline and coiled tubing interventions are required.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.