2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cementless titanium tapered-wedge femoral stem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
24
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the polyethylene used in this series consisted of either gamma-irradiated in air polyethylene (for the 68 HG-I acetabular components) or non-crosslinked polyethylene (for the 32 Duraloc acetabular components). These results are comparable to or better than the results of other cementless hip replacement reports (Table 4) [1,2,5,7,9,12,14,16,22,24,[26][27][28][29]31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is important to note that the polyethylene used in this series consisted of either gamma-irradiated in air polyethylene (for the 68 HG-I acetabular components) or non-crosslinked polyethylene (for the 32 Duraloc acetabular components). These results are comparable to or better than the results of other cementless hip replacement reports (Table 4) [1,2,5,7,9,12,14,16,22,24,[26][27][28][29]31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is significantly different from what reported in a previous study, in which an increase in the femur at the tip of stems has been found (34). By using a high press-fit stem for the tibial component in rTKA we have observed a bone apposition at 3 and 6 months, and a lesser resorption at 24 months compared to the low press-fit implantation (53). Bone remodelling activity in THA and in rTKA is a process that seems to intensively develop during the first year after surgery, then reducing in the second year (32,34,47,(54)(55)(56)(57).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Our series did support a higher failure rate of the cup A compared to the other cups. A review of the literature reveals several recent publications that support a good survivorship for this prosthesis [6,7,9,14]. Furthermore, our study provides results up to 18 years, with only two patients lost to follow-up, and includes information on three different acetabular components and the femoral stem prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%