2020
DOI: 10.1130/abs/2020am-353996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cenozoic Evolution of the Northern Caribbean Plate Boundary: Insights From Thermochronometric, Kinematic and Geomorphic Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We added to an existing database for the region, the Caribbean and Central American active fault database (CCAF‐DB; Styron et al., 2020). We incorporated additional data sources (Conrad et al., 2020; Corbeau, Rolandone, Leroy, Mercier de Lépinay, et al., 2016; French & Schenk, 2004; Possee et al., 2019; Saint Fleur et al., 2020) and compared to Shuttle Radar Topography Mission digital elevation model (SRTM) and Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) DEMs. We used the updated fault traces database to build a 3D fault model for the earthquake, including southern and northern branches of the EPGFZ, a thrust fault south of the epicentral location, and a larger northern thrust fault (Figures 1 and 3 and Figures S2 and S3 in Supporting Information ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We added to an existing database for the region, the Caribbean and Central American active fault database (CCAF‐DB; Styron et al., 2020). We incorporated additional data sources (Conrad et al., 2020; Corbeau, Rolandone, Leroy, Mercier de Lépinay, et al., 2016; French & Schenk, 2004; Possee et al., 2019; Saint Fleur et al., 2020) and compared to Shuttle Radar Topography Mission digital elevation model (SRTM) and Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) DEMs. We used the updated fault traces database to build a 3D fault model for the earthquake, including southern and northern branches of the EPGFZ, a thrust fault south of the epicentral location, and a larger northern thrust fault (Figures 1 and 3 and Figures S2 and S3 in Supporting Information ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%