2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cenozoic exhumation on the southwestern Barents Shelf: Estimates and uncertainties constrained from compaction and thermal maturity analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
102
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
6
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volumes of sediments deposited in the Bear Island Trough Mouth Fan as a result of the Cenozoic erosion in the Barents Sea shelf comprise approximately 70 % glacial and 30 % pre-glacial sediments [4]. In the study area very high glacial erosion was balanced by high glacial deposition of the reworked sediments.…”
Section: Pleistocene Contribution To Net Erosionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The volumes of sediments deposited in the Bear Island Trough Mouth Fan as a result of the Cenozoic erosion in the Barents Sea shelf comprise approximately 70 % glacial and 30 % pre-glacial sediments [4]. In the study area very high glacial erosion was balanced by high glacial deposition of the reworked sediments.…”
Section: Pleistocene Contribution To Net Erosionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…During the Cenozoic, the southern Barents Sea Basin and Fennoscandia were mainly in a state of uplift and erosion (Henriksen et al, 2011b;Laberg et al, 2012;Baig et al, 2016). The total erosion along the southern Barents Sea is estimated at ~1200 m, and approximately half of this is estimated to be due glacial erosion during the last 2.7 m.y.…”
Section: Linking a Triassic Delta To Present-day Catchmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total erosion along the southern Barents Sea is estimated at ~1200 m, and approximately half of this is estimated to be due glacial erosion during the last 2.7 m.y. (Laberg et al, 2012;Baig et al, 2016). The erosion onshore in northern Fennoscandia is uncertain.…”
Section: Linking a Triassic Delta To Present-day Catchmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sediments deposited in the Barents Sea region are affected by several phases of uplift and net erosion because of opening stages of the Atlantic and Arctic oceans and also glacial erosion during the Plio-Pleistocene period (Faleide et al, 1993;Dore and Lundin, 1996;Henriksen et al, 2011). The amount of exhumation is varied between 400 and 3000 m in different parts of the greater Barents Sea (Ohm et al, 2008;Henriksen et al, 2011;Baig et al, 2016). Henriksen et al (2011) and Baig et al (2016) estimate 1300 m of exhumation for the Jurassic sediments at well 7125/1-1.…”
Section: Geologic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of exhumation is varied between 400 and 3000 m in different parts of the greater Barents Sea (Ohm et al, 2008;Henriksen et al, 2011;Baig et al, 2016). Henriksen et al (2011) and Baig et al (2016) estimate 1300 m of exhumation for the Jurassic sediments at well 7125/1-1.…”
Section: Geologic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%