2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11749-016-0486-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Censored mixed-effects models for irregularly observed repeated measures with applications to HIV viral loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we would like to emphasize the importance of ensuring the constraints to be scientifically sensible before applying constrained statistical inference. For example, some HIV studies 26 considered longer follow‐up periods during which the constraints of positive viral decay rates were less likely to hold due to long‐term complications such as drug side‐effects or loss/attenuation of efficacy. In that case, a constrained test may not be applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we would like to emphasize the importance of ensuring the constraints to be scientifically sensible before applying constrained statistical inference. For example, some HIV studies 26 considered longer follow‐up periods during which the constraints of positive viral decay rates were less likely to hold due to long‐term complications such as drug side‐effects or loss/attenuation of efficacy. In that case, a constrained test may not be applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the work of Matos et al, the individual score can be determined as boldsfalse(yi2.5ptfalse|2.5ptbold-italicθfalse)-1pt=-1ptlogffalse(yifalse|bold-italicθfalse)bold-italicθ-1pt=-1ptE()icfalse(bold-italicθfalse|ycifalse)bold-italicθ2.5ptfalse|2.5ptVi,Ci,bold-italicθ, where ℓ i c ( θ | y c i ) is the complete data log‐likelihood formed from the observation y c i (see the work of Louis). Then, the empirical information matrix is given by Iefalse(trueθ^2.5ptfalse|2.5ptboldyfalse)=truei=1ntrues^itrues^i, where trues^i=()trues^i,β1,,trues^i,βp,trues^i,σ12,,trues^i,σr2,trues^i,α1,,trues^i,αq,trues^i,ϕ1,trues^i,ϕ2,trues^i,ν,…”
Section: Estimation Of the Likelihood And Standard Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the work of Matos et al, 5 the individual score can be determined as sboldyibold-italicθ= log fboldyi|θθ=EicθboldyciθboldVi,boldCi,θ where ℓ ic ( θ | y ci ) is the complete data log-likelihood formed from the observation y ci (see the work of Louis 28 ). Then, the empirical information matrix is given by boldIebold-italicθtrue^boldy=true∑i=1nbolds^ibolds^i, where trues^i=trues^i,β1, ,trues^i,βp,trues^i,σ12, ,...…”
Section: Estimation Of the Likelihood And Standard Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, and still using this dataset, Matos et al. 24 proposed a censored nonlinear mixed-effects model using a damped exponential correlation structure for the error term. For a more detailed description of the HIV/AIDS study, we refer the interested reader to Lederman et al.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%