2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0010417507000400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Census and Sensibilities in Sarajevo

Abstract: During the latter part of the twentieth century, there was a country called Yugoslavia. Built on the ruins of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, the post-World War II Socialist Federated Republic of Yugoslavia was an ethnically diverse state comprised of six republics, which, by the 1960s, was committed to a foreign policy of non-alignment and to the domestic programs of worker self–management and “brotherhood and unity” among its peoples (see, e.g., Banac 1984; P. Ramet 1985; Shoup 1968; Zimmerman 1987). Like most ot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas this article makes references to collective categories-Bosniacs, Bosnian Serbs, and so on-not all people living in Bosnia and Herzegovina identify with these groups, nor do they all blame the war on whole collectivities of "Others" (Markowitz 2007;Selimovic;, this volume). For example, when three long-term Bosnian male friends, whose names indicate that they belong to three different nationalities, met to drink coffee after the war were they then engaging in an act of reconciliation?…”
Section: Conclusion: Researching Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Whereas this article makes references to collective categories-Bosniacs, Bosnian Serbs, and so on-not all people living in Bosnia and Herzegovina identify with these groups, nor do they all blame the war on whole collectivities of "Others" (Markowitz 2007;Selimovic;, this volume). For example, when three long-term Bosnian male friends, whose names indicate that they belong to three different nationalities, met to drink coffee after the war were they then engaging in an act of reconciliation?…”
Section: Conclusion: Researching Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In order to understand why a campaign emerged to instruct Bosniaks to identify in a structured manner, it is necessary to look to broader debates about Bosniak ethnicity and the implications of Bosniaks' status as the largest of the three constituent peoples. The group now commonly referred to as Bosniaks were not given their own category in the Yugoslav census until 1971, when Muslim nationality was added alongside Serb, Croat and Yugoslav categories as a result of decisions on official recognition taken in the 1960s (Markowitz : 52; see also Bieber : 880–82). This category survived through to the final Yugoslav census in 1991, but in 1993, the Bošnjački sabor [Bosniak Assembly] officially adopted the name ‘Bosniak’ (Bougarel : 143; Bringa : 33–36).…”
Section: Bitno Je Biti Bošnjak: the Bosniak Campaignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ‘Federation‐wide social mapping exercise’ did take place in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) in 2002 (Markowitz ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ena najpogostejših razprav v prehodnem obdobju Sarajeva se je zato vrtela okrog povojnega razvoja, ki vključuje mnoga pomembna socialna, politična in ekonomska vprašanja (npr. Karahasan in Drakulić, 1994;Morley in Robins, 1995;Bollens, 2001;Perry, 2003;Donia, 2006;Sorabji, 2006;Bougarel idr., 2007;Markowitz, 2007;Pilav, 2012;Gül in Dee, 2015).…”
Section: Kriza Identitete Sarajeva -Zadnji Klic Na Pomočunclassified