2001
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-01-02799-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centered complexity one Hamiltonian torus actions

Abstract: Abstract. We consider symplectic manifolds with Hamiltonian torus actions which are "almost but not quite completely integrable": the dimension of the torus is one less than half the dimension of the manifold. We provide a complete set of invariants for such spaces when they are "centered" and the moment map is proper. In particular, this classifies the preimages under the moment map of all sufficiently small open sets, which is an important step towards global classification. As an application, we construct a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand the completely integrable systems with local torus actions of Kogan [30] form a relatively close generalization of torus actions with Lagrangian principal orbits. The classification of Hamiltonian circle actions on compact connected four-dimensional manifolds in Karshon [27], and of centered complexity one Hamiltonian torus actions in arbitrary dimensions in Karshon and Tolman [28], are also much richer than our classification in the case that n − d h ≤ 1. McDuff [37] and McDuff and Salamon [38] studied non--Hamiltonian circle actions, and Ginzburg [18] non-Hamiltonian symplectic actions of compact groups under the assumption of a "Lefschetz condition".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…On the other hand the completely integrable systems with local torus actions of Kogan [30] form a relatively close generalization of torus actions with Lagrangian principal orbits. The classification of Hamiltonian circle actions on compact connected four-dimensional manifolds in Karshon [27], and of centered complexity one Hamiltonian torus actions in arbitrary dimensions in Karshon and Tolman [28], are also much richer than our classification in the case that n − d h ≤ 1. McDuff [37] and McDuff and Salamon [38] studied non--Hamiltonian circle actions, and Ginzburg [18] non-Hamiltonian symplectic actions of compact groups under the assumption of a "Lefschetz condition".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The terminology semi-toric may be confusing, with the risk of being mistaken for almost-toric. A more precise phrase would be "almost-toric with deficiency index one" or "almost-toric with complexity one" [11]. We shall keep semi-toric for its shortness.…”
Section: Definition 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is a byproduct of our work on the classification of complexity one Hamiltonian torus actions [18,20,21,22,23], but, in fact, it relies only on elementary aspects of such actions. It is motivated by a number of recent works by toric topologists (specifically, the papers [7,9,8,3] by Buchstaber and Terzic and by Ayzenberg) that explore the topology of the geometric quotients of manifolds with certain torus actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%