1976
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(76)90357-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central Areolar Pigment Epithelial Dystrophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition described by Fetkenhour et al [3] seems to be identical to those herein and to those described by Lojler et al [1] and Frank et al [2], Because there was no evidence of pro gression and little variation in the small group of patients Fetkenhour et al [3] exam ined, they felt they were describing a new entity and called it central areolar pigment epithelial dystrophy. Even though this was not the first name given to this disease, this term is preferable to hereditary macular de generation of Lojler et al [1] or dominant progressive foveal dystrophy [2], The former is too general and is not descriptive of the condition while the term suggested by Frank et al [2] is identical to that used to describe a completely different disease [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The condition described by Fetkenhour et al [3] seems to be identical to those herein and to those described by Lojler et al [1] and Frank et al [2], Because there was no evidence of pro gression and little variation in the small group of patients Fetkenhour et al [3] exam ined, they felt they were describing a new entity and called it central areolar pigment epithelial dystrophy. Even though this was not the first name given to this disease, this term is preferable to hereditary macular de generation of Lojler et al [1] or dominant progressive foveal dystrophy [2], The former is too general and is not descriptive of the condition while the term suggested by Frank et al [2] is identical to that used to describe a completely different disease [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The only consis tent abnormality was an elevated glycine in 6 of these individuals. Fetkenhour et al [3] also tested single random urine samples but found no evidence of abnormal levels of amino acids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fetkenhour et al [18] haben einen Fall mit dem Bild einer SSM beschrieben, später kam es aber auch hier zu den klassischen atrophischen Verände-rungen der zentralen areolären Aderhautdystrophie.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified