“…Communicating had a large role for monetary policy during the financial crisis as the rapidly growing uncertainty set new challenges which led to a growing number of disagreements among the policymakers (Meade, Burk and Josselyn, 2015) and a remarkable increase in the length of the minutes of central bank meetings as well as a growing number of disagreements between central bank policymakers as the conduct of monetary policy became more complex (Coenen et al, 2017). However, Lehtimäki and Palmu (2019) show that, despite these increases in disagreements and length of minutes, the predictability of monetary policy decisions was reached quite well on an institutional level in the ECB and the Fed as the financial crisis unfolded, although a survey study by Hayo and Neuenkirch (2015) finds that during the crisis, communication from the Fed was perceived to be more credible 3 by financial market participants. This article assumes that disagreements between individual policymakers about the future path of monetary policy can be detected from the comments made to the media and that, despite the decision-making processes in the ECB and the Fed, the preferences of individuals may vary, and this can be observed in their communication.…”