Central dimensions of clinical practice evaluation: efficiency, appropriateness and effectiveness ‐ I

Abstract

Successful audit of clinical practice focuses upon the systematic investigation of key aspects of the everyday work of busy clinicians. We contend that the nature and quality of local clinical practice can be characterized by critical examinations of the effectiveness and appropriateness of practice and the efficiency with which effective, appropriate clinical care is delivered to patients. When such a baseline has been established, it becomes possible to compare and contrast characterized local practice with so-called 'evidence-based' practice and agree changes aimed at narrowing the discrepancy between the two. The nature of such changes can be described and their implementation into practice studied, with subsequent quantitative measurement and qualitative description of the resulting benefits to patients. A proper understanding of the concepts of efficiency, appropriateness and effectiveness in clinical care is clearly fundamental to the successful design and applications of methodologies aimed at securing measurable improvements in the quality of patient care. In this first of two articles we examine the concepts of efficiency and appropriateness in clinical practice, with particular emphasis on cost-effectiveness and utilization review. The clinical effectiveness of health care intervention is treated in detail within the second paper, to be published within Volume 2 Number 2 of the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (Miles et al. 1996f).

Demand management: another marketing tool or a way to quality care?

“…They may also help to optimize economic, clinical and humanistic health outcomes. The rapidly increasing assortment of DM tools must be carefully evaluated in order to extract the maximum benefits from the available resources (O'Neill et al 1996). There are three levels to consider when evaluating the effectiveness of DM products: (1) the vendor product evaluation level, (2) the health care system continuous improvement level, and (3) the health services research level.…”

How technological innovations in performance measurement systems overcome management challenges in healthcare

“…Internal pressure is predominantly associated with the ever-increasing complexity of the processes carried out, which require constant attention to the level of efficiency in the use of resources and of effectiveness in achieving the established objectives (Simonen et al. , 2012), but also to their appropriateness in terms of their ability to respond to actual health needs with an adequate range of services (O'Neil et al. , 1996; Perleth et al.…”

Survival Analysis in Quality Improvement: The Diabetic Kidney Disease Project Extrapolation Group Estimates

“…The 1990s saw renewed interest in, and development of, clinical piactice guidelines (Eddy, 1990;Woolf, 1990). The emphasis on cost and cost-effectiveness led to a critical reassessment of the bases of clinical practice and to the disconcerting realization that much of medical practice has relatively meager scientific support (O'Neill,Miles,8c Polychronis, 1996;Tanenbaum, 1995). Numerous small area analyses revealed that significant variations in medical practice often resulted in no measuiable differences in health status (Wennberg, 1984).…”