2001
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central matter distributions in rich clusters of galaxies from ${z\sim{0}}$ to ${z\sim {0.5}}$

Abstract: Abstract.We have analyzed the galaxy number density and luminosity density profiles of rich clusters of galaxies from redshifts z ∼ 0 to z ∼ 0.5. We show that the luminosity profile computed with bright galaxies (MR < −21) is significantly cusped in the center of the clusters, whatever the redshift. This is in agreement with the dark matter profiles predicted by numerical simulations. The galaxy number density profile for the bright galaxies is fitted equally well with a core model or a cusped model. In contra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of a cusped model, the best fit values are β = 0.49 ± 0.10 and r c = 3.4 ± 0.3 arcmin (0.72 ± 0.07 Mpc). The values of β are, within the errors, in agreement with those found by Adami et al (2001) from a sample of nearby clusters (β beta model = 1.0 ± 0.02 and β cusped = 0.56 ± 0.01), while the values of r c are significantly higher (the values in Adami et al 2001, when converted to our cosmology, are r c = 0.13 ± 0.07 Mpc for the beta model and r c = 0.45 ± 0.05 Mpc for the cusped model). For comparison, the values for the gas profile are r c = 1.2 arcmin and β = 0.62 (Elbaz et al 1995).…”
Section: Density Profilessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of a cusped model, the best fit values are β = 0.49 ± 0.10 and r c = 3.4 ± 0.3 arcmin (0.72 ± 0.07 Mpc). The values of β are, within the errors, in agreement with those found by Adami et al (2001) from a sample of nearby clusters (β beta model = 1.0 ± 0.02 and β cusped = 0.56 ± 0.01), while the values of r c are significantly higher (the values in Adami et al 2001, when converted to our cosmology, are r c = 0.13 ± 0.07 Mpc for the beta model and r c = 0.45 ± 0.05 Mpc for the cusped model). For comparison, the values for the gas profile are r c = 1.2 arcmin and β = 0.62 (Elbaz et al 1995).…”
Section: Density Profilessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…2 )) β , as defined in Adami et al (2001), using a Levenverg-Marquardt χ 2 algorithm, which gives simultaneously the three parameters σ 0 , r c and β.…”
Section: Density Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The profile of the low-mass objects displays a core, and is less centrally concentrated than that of the high-mass clusters which is in fact rather cuspy. As expected, due to the presence of the Brightest Cluster Galaxies at the center of the systems, the luminosity profiles are generally more cuspy than the density profiles in the same cluster mass bins (Adami et al 2001).…”
Section: Number Density Profiles and Projection Effectssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…We adopt their average value of r s = 0.26 Mpc among the 41 clusters whose velocity dispersions are observationally determined. The recent work based on a sample of 77 composite ENACS clusters gives the similar result, r s = 0.318 Mpc (Adami et al 2001).…”
Section: Samplesupporting
confidence: 62%