1988
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90184-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central muscarinic cholinergic antagonists block wet-dog shakes produced by the TRH analog MK-771 in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the different time-course of the biochemical and behavioural effects and the lack of the latter during the increase in ACh output elicited by local TRH infusion indicate that the two effects are not simply related to each other. Although Sills et al (1988) reported that the wet-dog shaking caused in the rat by an analogue of TRH (MK-771) is blocked, in a noncompetitive manner, by atropine or scopolamine, other evidence indicates that the stereotyped behaviour and the locomotor effects elicited by TRH rely also on other neurotransmitter systems, particularly the dopaminergic system of the nucleus accumbens (Roth et al, 1976;Kalivas et al, 1987). In this respect, TRH stimulates the release of [3H]-dopamine from slices of rat nucleus accumbens but not nucleus caudate in vitro (Kerwin & Pycock, 1979); bilateral injections of TRH into the nucleus accumbens of rats increase locomotor activity and promote behavioural activities similar to those produced by activation of the dopaminergic system (Heal & Green, 1979;Heal et al, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the different time-course of the biochemical and behavioural effects and the lack of the latter during the increase in ACh output elicited by local TRH infusion indicate that the two effects are not simply related to each other. Although Sills et al (1988) reported that the wet-dog shaking caused in the rat by an analogue of TRH (MK-771) is blocked, in a noncompetitive manner, by atropine or scopolamine, other evidence indicates that the stereotyped behaviour and the locomotor effects elicited by TRH rely also on other neurotransmitter systems, particularly the dopaminergic system of the nucleus accumbens (Roth et al, 1976;Kalivas et al, 1987). In this respect, TRH stimulates the release of [3H]-dopamine from slices of rat nucleus accumbens but not nucleus caudate in vitro (Kerwin & Pycock, 1979); bilateral injections of TRH into the nucleus accumbens of rats increase locomotor activity and promote behavioural activities similar to those produced by activation of the dopaminergic system (Heal & Green, 1979;Heal et al, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the animal models of memory impairment can be used directly to test new drug therapies for eventual human use in treating memory disorders. For example, the modeling capacity of scopolamine has been extensively utilized over the past few years to demonstrate the potential usefulness of serotonergic (Altman et al, 1987;Costall et a1,1989;Normile & Altman, 1988), adrenergic (Quartermain & Leo, 1988;Stone et al, 1988), dopaminergic (Levin, 1988;Yamamoto et al, 1990), peptidergic (Itoh et al, 1988;Sills et al, 1988), opiate , nootropic (Piercey et al, 1987 ;Verloes et al, 1988), ergot alkaloid (Voronina et al, 1988 ), and steroid agents (Flood et al, 1988) in reversing, or at least attenuating, some of scopolamine's acute amnestic effects. While the cholinergic model of memory impairment with scopolamine is probably the best known example of pharmacological modeling in various species Bartus & Johnson, 1982), it is also well recognized that other neurotransmitter systems are involved in the memory process in animals (Haroutunian et al, 1986;Sidel, 1988;Vanderwolf, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%