2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central screw placement in percutaneous screw scaphoid fixation: a cadaveric comparison of proximal and distal techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
62
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
62
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent work by some authors [10,17] has shown that the dorsal approach provides better targeting and more precise placement of the screw. Therefore, we felt the need to assess the efficacy of this approach for percutaneous fixation of scaphoid fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, recent work by some authors [10,17] has shown that the dorsal approach provides better targeting and more precise placement of the screw. Therefore, we felt the need to assess the efficacy of this approach for percutaneous fixation of scaphoid fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of screw position in the scaphoid has been emphasised by various authors [10,11]. The central placement of the screw in the proximal fragment of the scaphoid is associated with excellent clinical outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Failure to accomplish this goal could lead to fracture nonunion, malunion, or displacement [2,35,36,40]. Numerous studies have made recommendations for better screw placement in the scaphoid [11,26,27,[32][33][34]42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%