2018
DOI: 10.1007/s41111-018-0091-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central State vs. Local Levels of Government: Understanding News Media Censorship in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the news media in such countries are considered as more authoritative and conservative (Ostini & Fung, 2002). Take China as an example, with a sophisticated news censorship program, the Chinese propaganda authorities can control the reporting of every piece of news, though they do not usually do so due to some political considerations (Kuang, 2018). For example, as part of its effort to monitor and manage local governments, the central government would encourage news organization at higher levels to report on wrongdoings of the local cadres so that legitimate ruling of the state led by the Chinese Communist Party (hereafter “Party-state”) is not ruined (Kuang, 2018; Liebman, 2011; Lorentzen, 2014).…”
Section: Political Control On News Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the news media in such countries are considered as more authoritative and conservative (Ostini & Fung, 2002). Take China as an example, with a sophisticated news censorship program, the Chinese propaganda authorities can control the reporting of every piece of news, though they do not usually do so due to some political considerations (Kuang, 2018). For example, as part of its effort to monitor and manage local governments, the central government would encourage news organization at higher levels to report on wrongdoings of the local cadres so that legitimate ruling of the state led by the Chinese Communist Party (hereafter “Party-state”) is not ruined (Kuang, 2018; Liebman, 2011; Lorentzen, 2014).…”
Section: Political Control On News Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common knowledge that Facebook, Google, YouTube and Twitter are banned, in fact, over 8,000 sites are banned in China (Greatfire.org). Studies (Kuang, 2018) suggest that all media content harmful to the legitimate ruling of the communist state is censored. To protect its rule, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has identified a few priorities including the sustaining of economic growth, nationalism, social stability, and rational legal authority and electoral legitimacy.…”
Section: The China Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the news most likely to be censored is news that the propaganda authorities believe will have a negative effect on the legitimate rule of the Communist Party state. Further, Chinese law mandates that all Chinese news media must contribute to the enhancement of party ruling (Kuang, 2018).…”
Section: The China Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with the dilemma, this increase in social-media driven transparency paves the way for the superior and central government to control local officials' malfeasance and departure from their political, legal, and ethical duties in a broader sense [20][21][22] . On one hand, the state allows and even actively stimulates social media, such as microblogs and blogs etc, to expose local officials' malpractice from incompetence to corruption before relevant officials are investigated or convicted, often with the idea to build countervailing power against the distortion of information between the central and local authorities [23] .In fact, it can help explain why the central authority tolerates negative news about local levels of government, though local authorities strive to suppress such news [24] . On the other hand, the central government may also use social media to monitor local officials and ensure local governments and their officials act responsibly [25][26] .…”
Section: The Role Of Social Media As Information Channel For the Centmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the central government would choose the strategy of "unsupervised" as its optimal choice, and local governments and their officials tend to adopt limited disclosure, which will trap them into "Prisoners' Dilemma" [11] . To deal with the dilemma, some literatures argued that the role of social media in alleviating the information asymmetry between the central and local government [12][13] . On one hand, social media in essence provides a timely and widespread information channel to supervise regional governments and their officials for the superior and central government, which can improve its supervision efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%