2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2022.101082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central supervision and earnings management: Quasi-experimental evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, in regions with lower regulatory intensity, the risk of earnings management detection is typically lower, providing greater incentives for internal actors to engage in such practices [ 79 , 80 ]. Similarly, more marketized provinces tend to provide less oversight and exhibit higher tolerance for earnings management [ 81 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, in regions with lower regulatory intensity, the risk of earnings management detection is typically lower, providing greater incentives for internal actors to engage in such practices [ 79 , 80 ]. Similarly, more marketized provinces tend to provide less oversight and exhibit higher tolerance for earnings management [ 81 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in previous studies, we also include several commonly used control variables (Nikbakht et al, 2021;Pan et al, 2022). Specifically, OWNER refers to a set of characteristics of the company's ownership structure before the first listing of shares on the stock exchange.…”
Section: Earnings Management In Ipomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X is a vector of control variables. Following Lin et al (2022a ; 2022b ; 2022c ), Pan et al (2022a ; 2022b ), Kong et al (2020) and Chen et al (2020) , we include the following variables in the regression model: (1) TARGETEXP , which is the number of years that an analyst followed a target; (2) FOLLOWCOMS , measured as natural logarithm of the number of target firms an analyst following in a fiscal year; (3) FOLLOWINDUS , measured as natural logarithm of the number of target industries an analyst following in a fiscal year; (4) GENERALEXP , which is natural logarithm of an analyst's working experience (year); (5) ALLSTAR , measured as a dummy that equals one if an analyst is ranked as first to fifth in the institutional investors’ ranking and zero otherwise; (6) BROKERSIZE , which is measured with natural logarithm of the number of active analysts for a broker in a fiscal year.…”
Section: Data and Empirical Designmentioning
confidence: 99%