1987
DOI: 10.2333/bhmk.14.22_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central Tendency of Decision Making under Uncertainty

Abstract: Studies on intuitive perceptual judgment have shown central tendency of judgment on a series of stimuli. In those studies, it is critical that the range of judgmental objects be restricted. Therefore in a restricted range of judgmental objects, judgment with prize is also expected to have central tendency, although it has not been examined to date. This paper examines central tendency of decision making under uncertainty which consists of probability and prize. The decision making problem is the choice between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found the presence of the central tendency, that is, a form of linear compression where small numbers in an interval are overestimated and large numbers are underestimated. This effect has been observed in diverse experimental settings (e.g., Huttenlocher, Hedges, & Duncan, 1991;Matthews & Stewart, 2009;Nakamura, 1987;Preston & Baratta, 1948;Sheth & Shimojo, 2001) and is likely to represent a general response bias under uncertainty. This view is supported by the findings in our study, showing that the responses were more randomly distributed for the participants with a stronger central tendency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found the presence of the central tendency, that is, a form of linear compression where small numbers in an interval are overestimated and large numbers are underestimated. This effect has been observed in diverse experimental settings (e.g., Huttenlocher, Hedges, & Duncan, 1991;Matthews & Stewart, 2009;Nakamura, 1987;Preston & Baratta, 1948;Sheth & Shimojo, 2001) and is likely to represent a general response bias under uncertainty. This view is supported by the findings in our study, showing that the responses were more randomly distributed for the participants with a stronger central tendency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%