2011
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-2010-10660-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central values of $L$-functions and half-integral weight forms

Abstract: Abstract. We prove a relation between the Fourier coefficients of certain Hilbert modular forms of half-integral weight and central values of the corresponding Rankin L-functions. The result generalizes the classical theorem by Waldspurger. The approach is geometric and generalizes that of Gross and Hatcher.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [Xue11], the author also follows the method of Gross for computing half-integral weight Hilbert modular forms to prove a Waldspurger's type formula, but with several restrictions such as working with prime level and odd class number of the base field, and with no focus on Hecke operators nor the Shimura correspondence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [Xue11], the author also follows the method of Gross for computing half-integral weight Hilbert modular forms to prove a Waldspurger's type formula, but with several restrictions such as working with prime level and odd class number of the base field, and with no focus on Hecke operators nor the Shimura correspondence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides extending [ST18], and thus the explicit formulas with l = 1 given in [Gro87,BSP90] when F = Q and in [Xue11] for more general F , our main result implies part of [Mao12, Theorem 1.1], where the author considers the case F = Q, odd prime level and weight 2. In that setting, the case D > 0 is covered by Mao, but not (yet) by our formula.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It follows in principle from general work of Waldspurger [43] and Shimura [35], but we were not able to extract the explicit statement above: the difficult part is to construct a nonzero form g. Baruch-Mao [1] prove Conjecture 2.8 in the case F = Q (using work of Kohnen for the existence of g). Xue [46] gives a proof for general F and prime level N = p, provided L(f, . We will discuss in § 3 an algorithm that conjecturally always computes the form g associated to f ∈ S k (N) when L(f, Remark 2.10.…”
Section: Twists Of L-functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we follow this construction with L(f, 1/2) = 0, then the corresponding form has g = 0: see Gross [15] and Böcherer-Schulze-Pillot [3] for the case F = Q and Xue [46] and Sirolli [38] for general F . On the other hand, one expects a nonzero g in Conjecture 2.8; see Mao-Rodriguez-Villegas-Tornaría [24] for an extension of this algorithm to compute g in this case.…”
Section: Brandt Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation