2021
DOI: 10.1111/ane.13553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central vein sign: A putative diagnostic marker for multiple sclerosis

Abstract: The relation between the cerebrovascular system and multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions had first been documented in 1863 by Rindfleisch et al. 1 and later revisited by Dow et al. in the mid-1900. 2 It was hypothesized that MS lesion formation depends on the entry of inflammatory cells from the systemic circulation into the brain parenchyma possibly from a disrupted endothelium of venules. 3-5 More recently, the presence of a "central vein sign" (CVS) on MRI has been introduced as a biomarker for the diagnosis of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(187 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher proportion of CVS-positive lesions was found in patients with MS/CIS compared to all the other conditions considered, resulting in high diagnostic performance. High specificity and moderate sensitivity were reached using the previously proposed 40% cutoff . Interestingly, in our cohort a lower cutoff (26%) showed the highest discriminative performance based on the Youden index, confirming the results of a similar previous multicenter study .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A higher proportion of CVS-positive lesions was found in patients with MS/CIS compared to all the other conditions considered, resulting in high diagnostic performance. High specificity and moderate sensitivity were reached using the previously proposed 40% cutoff . Interestingly, in our cohort a lower cutoff (26%) showed the highest discriminative performance based on the Youden index, confirming the results of a similar previous multicenter study .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The diagnostic performance was superior to that of CLs (AUC, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75-0.80]; P < .001). Using the previously proposed 40% threshold, 27 the CVS provided sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 78.7% [95% CI, 75.5-82.0], 86.0% [95% CI, 82.1-89.5], and 81.5% [95% CI, 78.9-83.7], respectively. Based on the Youden index, a 26% CVS-positive proportion threshold had the best discriminative performance (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy: 88.0% [95% CI, 85.3-90.7], 80.9% [95% CI, 76.6-84.9], and 85.3% [95% CI, 83.0-87.6], respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the absence of clear definitions and standard MRI sequences for their detection contribute to the challenges in utilizing these biomarkers. However, highresolution T2*W three-dimensional echoplanar imaging (3D-EPI) or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR*) sequences have been identified as optimal for CVS detection [30,78,79], while phase 3D-EPI, susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), and multi-echo T2* gradient echo (GRE) are recommended for PRS assessment [80]. Nonetheless, these sequences are currently missing from diagnostic MR protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%