2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-010-1005-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection and colonisation of insertion site and catheter tip. What are the rates and risk factors in haematology patients?

Abstract: Skin colonisation is an important source for central venous catheter (CVC) colonisation and infection. This study intended to identify risk factors for skin colonisation prior to CVC placement (baseline colonisation) and within 10 days after CVC insertion (subsequent colonisation), for CVC-tip colonisation and for bloodstream infection (BSI). Within a randomised clinical trial, data of 219 patients with haematological malignancies and inserted CVC (with a total of 5,501 CVC-days and 4,275 days at risk) in two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
18
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The search revealed nine publications that reported differences between men and women with respect to incidence of BSI (Table 5, available online). [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Controlling for a variety of covariates, three of the articles reported that men had significantly higher infection rates than women, and six reported no significant gender differences. Although the majority found no significant gender differences, the fact that all studies reporting significant differences found that males were at higher risk suggests a possible association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The search revealed nine publications that reported differences between men and women with respect to incidence of BSI (Table 5, available online). [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Controlling for a variety of covariates, three of the articles reported that men had significantly higher infection rates than women, and six reported no significant gender differences. Although the majority found no significant gender differences, the fact that all studies reporting significant differences found that males were at higher risk suggests a possible association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have found that bacterial colonization of the skin surrounding a central venous catheter at the insertion site is greater on men than on women, even when controlling for baseline colonization. [19][20][21][22] In addition, it has been suggested that hair growth and shaving interfere with wound dressing adherence, which could lead to a higher risk of infection among men who have thicker, coarser hair. 22 The fact that our study revealed no gender differences in infection rates among young children supports this theory, since gender differences in skin quality and hair growth are not pronounced in childhood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is interesting since male gender has been indicated as a risk factor for postoperative infection after cardiac pacemaker implantations as well as in large studies of surgical site infections and community-acquired blood stream infections [14,15]. Theories explaining this include male susceptibility for bacterial colonization indicated by studies on central venous catheters and that male body hair may interfere with antiseptic scrubbing and wound dressings [15,16]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luft (2010) relata ser indispensável à redução da carga microbiana na região de inserção do cateter e aponta a importância dessa contribuição para a prevenção antes que a colonização progrida para infecção.…”
Section: Resultados Relacionados Ao Terceiro E Quarto Cvcs Dos Pacientesunclassified