2013
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.45.5733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central Venous Catheter Care for the Patient With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Abstract: There is insufficient evidence to recommend one CVC type or insertion site; femoral catheterization should be avoided. CVC should be placed by well-trained providers, and the use of a CVC clinical care bundle is recommended. The use of antimicrobial/antiseptic-impregnated and/or heparin-impregnated CVCs is recommended to decrease the risk of catheter-related infections for short-term CVCs, particularly in high-risk groups; more research is needed. The prophylactic use of systemic antibiotics is not recommended… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
254
0
38

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
2
254
0
38
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, ASCO guidelines [137] • Regarding the enteral nutrition, there were significantly more infections in the PEG group (66%) compared to the NGT group (30%) p = 0.001 in the prospective study of Corry et al [124], but the difference of pneumonia between the two groups (PEG = 31.3% vs. NGT = 30%) was statistically insignificant. In fact, the majority of infections in the PEG group were at the PEG site (31%: 10/32).…”
Section: -The Evaluation Of the Suspected Infection Sourcementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, ASCO guidelines [137] • Regarding the enteral nutrition, there were significantly more infections in the PEG group (66%) compared to the NGT group (30%) p = 0.001 in the prospective study of Corry et al [124], but the difference of pneumonia between the two groups (PEG = 31.3% vs. NGT = 30%) was statistically insignificant. In fact, the majority of infections in the PEG group were at the PEG site (31%: 10/32).…”
Section: -The Evaluation Of the Suspected Infection Sourcementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cancer patients with implantable port systems experienced a median of 0.2 infections per 1000 catheter-days (range: 0-2.7 per 1000 catheter-days) [134] versus a risk that ranges from 1.4 to 2.2 infections per 1000 catheter-days for subcutaneous tunneled CVCs [135,136]. Nevertheless, this difference may be biased by the fact that patients who receive implantable subcutaneous ports usually receive much less intensive cancer therapy [137]. Thus, the optimal device to be used during CRT is hardly advisable and needs further prospective trials.…”
Section: -The Evaluation Of the Suspected Infection Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flushes are usually a sterile saline or heparin saline solution which is injected to fill the catheter. If an institution utilizes heparin saline for flushes, care should be exercised to identify patients with contraindications to heparin such as history of hypersensitivity reaction, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) [17][18][19]. There are many devices available for central venous access but they are generally composed of silicone or polyurethane which allows for relative stiffness at room temperature and a softened state at body temperature [6,11].…”
Section: Indications and Cathetersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 In this study, articles that evaluated this place of insertion regarding the risk of infections were not included. , catheter-related infection 9,11,16 and infection of the subcutaneous pouch 20 were the most prevalent infections in the studies, with a predominance of gram-negative bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus 12,14,16,19,20 and Sthaphylococcus epidermis.…”
Section: 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%