2004
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central venous catheters—the inability of ‘intra-atrial ECG’ to prove adequate positioning

Abstract: The start of an increase in P wave size does not correspond with the entrance of the right atrium. The anatomic equivalent for the electrophysiological changes of the ECG is the pericardial reflection. ECG guidance is unable to distinguish between venous and arterial catheter position.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
25
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, Schummer et al (17) demonstrate that intraatrial ECG is not reliable for detecting whether a central catheter is positioned IV or intraarterially. According to their data, it is questionable whether the elevation in the P-wave (P-atriale) is caused by the RA or rather by the pericardial reflection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Schummer et al (17) demonstrate that intraatrial ECG is not reliable for detecting whether a central catheter is positioned IV or intraarterially. According to their data, it is questionable whether the elevation in the P-wave (P-atriale) is caused by the RA or rather by the pericardial reflection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 In addition, conductance is more direct than other nonfluoroscopic PICC navigation and tip location technologies such as electrocardiographic, Doppler flow, and stylet-aided magnetic guidance. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Electrocardiographic and Doppler flow methods have been controversial and not widely adopted in the clinic, while stylet-aided magnetic guidance provides a nonanatomically based relative assessment of PICC position. These and other bedside guidance technologies (eg, SwanGanz catheters 27 ) exist and rely on physiological measurements to confirm catheter location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors suggested that an increase in the P-wave amplitude already starts at the pericardial reflection outside the heart and ECG guidance cannot distinguish whether a catheter is placed intraarterially or intravenously 11,26. Fluoroscopy or transesophageal echocardiography may be more reliable methods to detect the position of central venous catheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%