1972
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197205000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central Venous Oxygen Saturation in Shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
7

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
49
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…19,20 Reinhart et al 21 compared mixed venous saturation to saturation in the superior vena cava in an experimental model and demonstrated an excellent correlation (r = 0.97). Lee et al 22 studied 29 stable patients and 15 patients in circulatory shock (septic, hemorrhagic and neurogenic) and detected a good correlation between venous atrial and mixed saturation. In the present study, the use of atrial blood for calculation of venous oxygen content showed a good correlation with venous content, especially when we used a correction factor (r = 0.94).…”
Section: Figure 4 -mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…19,20 Reinhart et al 21 compared mixed venous saturation to saturation in the superior vena cava in an experimental model and demonstrated an excellent correlation (r = 0.97). Lee et al 22 studied 29 stable patients and 15 patients in circulatory shock (septic, hemorrhagic and neurogenic) and detected a good correlation between venous atrial and mixed saturation. In the present study, the use of atrial blood for calculation of venous oxygen content showed a good correlation with venous content, especially when we used a correction factor (r = 0.94).…”
Section: Figure 4 -mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In patients with a failing heart ScvO2 was slightly higher than SvO2 and in shock patients the difference between SvO2 to ScvO2 was even more expressed (47.5% ± 15.11% vs. 58.0% ± 13.05%, respectively, p<0.001). Lee and co-workers described similar findings (51). Other more detailed studies in mixed groups of critically-ill patients designed to test if the ScvO2 measurements could substitute the SvO2 showed problematically large confidence limits (52) and poor correlation between the two values (53).…”
Section: Nirs For Evaluation Of Skeletal Muscle Tissue Oxygenation Inmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Consequently, ScvO 2 is usually less than SvO 2 mainly due to high oxygen content in renal venous drainage2, this relationship changes in sick patients with hemodynamic changes, oxygen extraction become higher in renal and splanchnic circulation resulting in reversal of SvO 2 -to-ScvO 2 relationship [19]. [20], this included critically ill ICU patients [21], and during liver transplantation [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%