2006
DOI: 10.1097/00003643-200606001-00712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central venous oxygen saturation versus mixed venous oxygen saturation in cardiac surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the recommended lower limit of SvO 2 for cardiosurgical patients is 60% 2 . Because there is a strong correlation between SvO 2 and ScvO 2 during cardiac surgery, 43 we have decided to use 60% as the lower threshold of ScvO 2 as well. Because thermodilution measurements and subsequent stabilization of hemodynamics need additional time and can prolong the duration of surgery, a decrease in ScvO 2 during OPCAB could be used as a screening parameter that implies reduced tissue perfusion due to hypovolemia, myocardial depression or anemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the recommended lower limit of SvO 2 for cardiosurgical patients is 60% 2 . Because there is a strong correlation between SvO 2 and ScvO 2 during cardiac surgery, 43 we have decided to use 60% as the lower threshold of ScvO 2 as well. Because thermodilution measurements and subsequent stabilization of hemodynamics need additional time and can prolong the duration of surgery, a decrease in ScvO 2 during OPCAB could be used as a screening parameter that implies reduced tissue perfusion due to hypovolemia, myocardial depression or anemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%