2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrality analysis in a drug network and its application to drug repositioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degree centrality represents the number of directly connected neighbours to a node. Centrality analysis, specifically with degree centrality, has been proven to help scientists in disease-related research, such as drug repositioning (18).…”
Section: Key Bacterial Family Differs Between Healthy and T2d Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degree centrality represents the number of directly connected neighbours to a node. Centrality analysis, specifically with degree centrality, has been proven to help scientists in disease-related research, such as drug repositioning (18).…”
Section: Key Bacterial Family Differs Between Healthy and T2d Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] Centrality measures play a vital role in network analysis, allowing researchers to identify important nodes within a network from a structural perspective. [14] Though frequently used in social network analysis, centrality measures have been adapted as a metric for biological studies since as early as 2001. [15] A previous drug repurposing study ranked drugs by their centrality scores within networks composed of drugs connected based on their side effects and interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Another study suggests that the centralities of drugs in a network of drugs connected based on their side-effect similarities may have signi cant implication in drug repurposing. [14] Most of those published applications mainly leveraged one aspect of drugs, such as side effects or interactions; thus nodes in their established network were speci cally associated with drugs (as opposed to other data types such as diseases, phenotypes, proteins, etc). Inspired by these studies, we proposed to generate integrative rare disease biomedical pro les with heterogenous types of data from our previously developed NCATS Genetic and Rare Diseases (GARD) Knowledge Graph (NGKG) [17] with forty-three rare disease related data resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%