Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3357223.3362709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centralized Core-granular Scheduling for Serverless Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sharing resources among functions and other serverless components is a challenging task. Therefore, good techniques are required to be investigated to achieve this goal [98,210,283].…”
Section: Resource Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharing resources among functions and other serverless components is a challenging task. Therefore, good techniques are required to be investigated to achieve this goal [98,210,283].…”
Section: Resource Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements to serverless platforms. Recent works have proposed serverless-optimized storage and caching solutions (e.g., Pocket [44], Savanna [29, § 3], Cloudburst [85], Aft [84], and HydroCache [97]), security enforcement via information flow control [3], and techniques to optimize the performance and resource usage of serverless platforms [1,42,49,61,65,80,82,85,94]. Kappa automatically benefits from transparent platform improvements, and can exploit new storage services by placing checkpoints and large queue elements there ( § 4).…”
Section: Other Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burst-N sends a burst of N simultaneous requests at once. Some initial studies have shown burst workloads to be common in serverless applications [40,52,56]. Continuous-N sends constant N requests per second.…”
Section: Apache Openwhisk Apachementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FnSched [96] manages invoker resources (VMs/containers that run functions) to ensure unnecessary latency is not incurred, while minimizing cost. Finally, [52] centrally schedules lambdas on CPU cores instead of servers to reduce latency. While some of the above works provide SLAs and function reordering (which Sequoia also provides), none of the works holistically study QoS to the extent our work does.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%