2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centralized Reminder/Recall to Increase Immunization Rates in Young Children: How Much Bang for the Buck?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study of parent perceptions regarding reminder/recall approaches, parents with lower education and public health insurance for their child were more likely to prefer that reminder/recall notifications come from the health department rather than the child's doctor . Centralized reminder/recall from health departments has also been proven to be more effective in increasing vaccination coverage as well more cost‐effective than practice‐based reminder/recall …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study of parent perceptions regarding reminder/recall approaches, parents with lower education and public health insurance for their child were more likely to prefer that reminder/recall notifications come from the health department rather than the child's doctor . Centralized reminder/recall from health departments has also been proven to be more effective in increasing vaccination coverage as well more cost‐effective than practice‐based reminder/recall …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…33 Centralized reminder/recall from health departments has also been proven to be more effective in increasing vaccination coverage as well more cost-effective than practice-based reminder/ recall. [34][35][36] Although children with sickle cell anemia had higher vaccination coverage, up to 45% were still not adequately vaccinated against IPD by 16 months of age. This is slightly lower than previously reported;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment has executed large-scale C-R/R studies for childhood but not for HPV vaccines. 24,26,27…”
Section: New York State Immunization Information System and Colorado mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,22,23 Previous trials revealed that C-R/R by using IISs for routine childhood vaccines (ie, not adolescent vaccines) was more effective and cost-effective than practice-based R/R. [24][25][26][27] HPV vaccination is more challenging than other adolescent vaccines 8 because of the need for multiple doses 28 and frequent parent questions 29 or vaccine hesitancy. [30][31][32] Thus, IIS-based C-R/R may not be effective for the HPV vaccine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Mobile health interventions that could be implemented both rapidly and cost-effectively are particularly promising in introducing health prevention interventions in humanitarian settings, given the widespread availability of mobile phones, and as the solutions can be adapted to different contexts. 12 However, while new mHealth interventions are currently undergoing field testing, to date there are no published studies on their full integration in health services provided for refugees. 13 In this paper, we describe a novel mHealth application, HERA App, and discuss the potential uses of mobile technologies in refugee populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%