Centration assessment of an extended depth of focus contact lens for myopic progression control

Rizzo, Giulia Carlotta; Vizio, Assunta Di; Versaci, Francesco; Przekoracka, Katarzyna; Tavazzi, Silvia; Zeri, Fabrizio

doi:10.1016/j.clae.2021.101533

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Mylo

(Mark'ennovy) is a silicone hydrogel CL (Filcon 5B) with an extended depth of focusdesign, powered by the Brien Holden Vision Institute's patented EDOF technology [ 17 ] and has been described by Rizzo et al [ 18 ] It has been proven to reduce myopia up to 43% after 2 years of usage, [ 19 ] with no rebound effect after this time. [ 20 ]…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[11,13] It has been reported to slow down myopia progression in spherical equivalent refraction by 39.3% over 2 years [14] and 59% over 3 years, [13] with minimal impact on ocular physiology in children, [15] minimising the myopic axial elongation but retaining the underlying physiological elongation observed in emmetropic eyes. [16] The Mylo TM (Mark'ennovy) is a silicone hydrogel CL (Filcon 5B) with an extended depth of focus design, powered by the Brien Holden Vision Institute's patented EDOF technology [17] and has been described by Rizzo et al [18] It has been proven to reduce myopia up to 43% after 2 years of usage, [19] with no rebound effect after this time. [20] The CL fit was assessed by the unmasked optometrist to ensure an acceptable fit before dispensing the CL.…”

Section: And Fittingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Visual Performance of Two Designs of Myopia Management Soft Contact Lenses Compared with a Monofocal One in Young Adults

Signes-Soler,

Roselló Sivera,

Cantó-Vañó

et al. 2023

JOVR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To compare the visual performance of two distinct types of soft contact lenses (CL) aimed at slowing down myopia progression with the performance of a monofocal soft CL. Methods: In a prospective double-masked, crossover trial, 18 myopic adults (aged 18–30 years old) were fitted in a randomized order with three types of disposable CL: MiSightTM (dual-focus), MyloTM (extended depth of focus -EDOF-), and ClaritiTM (single distance vision). Measurements were taken after wearing the CL for five days with five days off in between at two different optometry centers. High contrast distance visual acuity (VA) with spectacles and for each of the different CL, subjective refraction, slit lamp exam, aberrometry, stereopsis, monocular and binocular amplitude of accommodation and accommodative facility, and horizontal phorias were measured. Results: The high contrast distance VA was better for the single vision CL compared to the myopia control CL. No significant differences were observed between the r two myopia control CL. The overall root mean square (RMS) was higher for the double focus CL (RMS = 1.18 ± 0.29 μm), followed by the EDOF CL (RMS = 0.76 ± 0.35 μm) and then the single vision CL (RMS = 0.50 ± 0.19 μm). The primary spherical aberration (SA) mean value was low for all of the three CL, without statistical differences among them. No other significant differences were detected. Conclusion: The overall RMS resulted in a higher value for the dual-focus than the EDOF CL, but no differences in high contrast distance VA and binocularity were detected between them. The monofocal CL’s performance was better than the myopia control CL.

show abstract

“…The Mylo

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%