2017
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centre‐level variation of treatment and outcome in 5‐year‐old children with non‐syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate: The Cleft Care UK study. Part 1: Methodology and results for dento‐facial outcomes

Abstract: Structured AbstractObjectivesOutline methods used to describe centre‐level variation in treatment and outcome in children in the Cleft Care UK (CCUK) study. Report centre‐level variation in dento‐facial outcomes.Setting and Sample PopulationTwo hundred and sixty‐eight five‐year‐old British children with non‐syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).Materials and MethodsBetween January 2011 and December 2012, data were collected on a comprehensive range of outcomes. Child facial appearance and symmetry w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All results are adjusted for differences in age and gender. Full details of the method for examining centre‐level variation are described elsewhere in this supplement …”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All results are adjusted for differences in age and gender. Full details of the method for examining centre‐level variation are described elsewhere in this supplement …”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All results are adjusted for differences in age and sex. Full details of the method for examining centre‐level variation is described in Wills et al . (within this supplement).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of the method for examining centre‐level variation is described in Wills et al. (within this supplement). As noted above, some children in particular centres had their dental assessment performed by uncalibrated assessors, and all children from one particular centre were assessed by an uncalibrated observer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%