Centred discourse, decentred practice: the relational production of Russian and Chinese ‘rising’ power in Central Asia

Heathershaw, John; Owen, Catherine; Cooley, Alexander

doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1627867

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…37 The CDB also provided several billions to Kazakhstan to promote cooperation in energy field. 38 According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kazakhstan, China's total investment until the end of March 2019 was $15.3 billion. Kazakhstan reciprocated with an investment of $4.25 billion in China.…”

Section: Energy Cooperationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The New Great Power Competition in Central Asia: Opportunities and Challenges for the Gulf

Sahakyan¹

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Energy Cooperationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The New Great Power Competition in Central Asia: Opportunities and Challenges for the Gulf

Sahakyan¹

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Other critiques focus on the absence of common interest and collective multilateral strategy, and their 'own ways of existing and doing things' (Byrappa, 2017: 81). Moreover, the group faces substantial differences in its paces and priorities of development aggravated by territorial disputes and military tension between India and China with clashes taking place in the Galwan valley in June 2020 that led to casualties on both sides, as well as rising competition between Russia, China and India for Central Asian influence and resources (Heathershaw et al, 2019).…”

Section: Limitations Of the Bricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction: ‘The BRICS, Global Governance, and Challenges for South–South Cooperation in a Post-Western World’

Duggan

Hooijmaaijers

Rewizorski

et al. 2021

International Political Science Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the past decades, the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) countries have experienced significant economic growth. However, their political voices in global governance have not grown on par with their economic surge. The contributions to the symposium ‘The BRICS, Global Governance, and Challenges for South–South Cooperation in a Post-Western World’ argue there is a quest for emerging markets and developing countries to play a more significant role in global governance. There is a widening gap between the actual role of emerging markets and developing countries in the global system and their ability to participate in that system. However, for the moment, various domestic and international political-economic challenges limit this quest. To understand why this is the case, one should understand the BRICS phenomenon in the broader context of the global power shift towards the Global South.

show abstract

The OSCE ODIHR and Regional Organisations as Norm Entrepreneurs: The Case of Post-pandemic Kyrgyzstan

Anghelescu

Dzardanova²

2022

Securitization and Democracy in Eurasia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified the illiberal trends already witnessed by experts and civil society in the OSCE region through increased corruption and lack of transparency in emergency response, as well as through abuses in terms of human rights and restricting civic participation. Building upon the existing literature on protective integration (Alexander Libman) and virtual regionalism (Roy Allison) in Central Asia, which argues that authoritarian leaders pursue various forms of regional cooperation in order to ensure regime survival, we intend to assess the place of the OSCE among the other regional organisations in which the Central Asian states are currently participating, as well as to evaluate how the OSCE Human Dimension has been transformed over the past few years. In this chapter, we intend to discuss the impact of the public health crisis on the democratic normative agenda. In this sense, we aim to analyse the OSCE-ODIHR Human Dimension agenda in Central Asia, specifically in Kyrgyzstan, during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the capacity of the OSCE to determine the respect for democratic standards in a contested area where multiple norm entrepreneurs are active.

show abstract

Centred discourse, decentred practice: the relational production of Russian and Chinese ‘rising’ power in Central Asia

Cited by 12 publications

References 37 publications

The New Great Power Competition in Central Asia: Opportunities and Challenges for the Gulf

The New Great Power Competition in Central Asia: Opportunities and Challenges for the Gulf

Introduction: ‘The BRICS, Global Governance, and Challenges for South–South Cooperation in a Post-Western World’

The OSCE ODIHR and Regional Organisations as Norm Entrepreneurs: The Case of Post-pandemic Kyrgyzstan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About