1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.1988.tb00570.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrifugal Fibers in the Chick Retina

Abstract: This work is a morhological study of the centrifugal fibers in the chick retina. We have classified these fibers in two types: type I centrifugal fibers and type I1 centrifugal fibers. Type 1 centrifugal fibers constitute a new model of axonic terminal in the birds retina. These fibers terminate exclusively in the inner plexiform layer where they show long tangential trajectories. Type 11 centrifugal fibers are coincident with classical ones previously described in the avian retina. With the Golgi method we de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases we were unable to identify the postsynaptic partners of tendrils; however, we do know that in some cases tendril synaptic boutons apparently contacted the soma of a lightly diaphorase-positive amacrine cell, clearly the Type 1 cell described by Fischer and Stell (1999). Other authors have mentioned observing small side branches from rEF terminals (Ramón y Cajal, 1889; Maturana & Frenk, 1965; Chmielewski et al , 1988; Fritzsch et al , 1990); however, these side branches were not described in sufficient detail to allow comparison with the tendrils described here. Maturana and Frenk (1965) claimed that displaced ganglion cells were one of the synaptic partners of tendrils, but this claim has been contested in multiple studies (Dowling & Cowan, 1966; Fritzsch et al , 1990; Uchiyama & Ito, 1993; Nickla et al , 1994) and synapses between tendrils and DGCs were not observed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In most cases we were unable to identify the postsynaptic partners of tendrils; however, we do know that in some cases tendril synaptic boutons apparently contacted the soma of a lightly diaphorase-positive amacrine cell, clearly the Type 1 cell described by Fischer and Stell (1999). Other authors have mentioned observing small side branches from rEF terminals (Ramón y Cajal, 1889; Maturana & Frenk, 1965; Chmielewski et al , 1988; Fritzsch et al , 1990); however, these side branches were not described in sufficient detail to allow comparison with the tendrils described here. Maturana and Frenk (1965) claimed that displaced ganglion cells were one of the synaptic partners of tendrils, but this claim has been contested in multiple studies (Dowling & Cowan, 1966; Fritzsch et al , 1990; Uchiyama & Ito, 1993; Nickla et al , 1994) and synapses between tendrils and DGCs were not observed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…ION axons form striking “convergent” terminals (Fischer & Stell, ; Lindstrom et al, ; Morgan et al, ; Nickla et al, ) on “association amacrine cells” (Ramón y Cajal, ; Mariani, ; Uchiyama & Stell, ), which are readily identifiable by their striking morphology and strong staining for Parvalbumin and NADPH‐diaphorase (Fischer & Stell, ; Lindstrom et al, ; Uchiyama & Stell, ; Wilson et al, ; present results, Figure b). The axons of ectopic centrifugal neurons form “divergent” terminals, which widely ramify in the IPL over a greater area of retinal space (Chmielewski et al, ; Dogiel, ; Fritzsch et al, ; Hayes & Holden, ; Lindstrom et al, ; Maturana & Frenk, ; Uchiyama & Ito, ; Woodson et al, ;). They have been suggested to contact displaced ganglion cells (Dogiel, ; Hayes & Holden, ; Maturana & Frenk, ; Nickla et al, ) and “flat” amacrine cells (Dogiel, ; Maturana & Frenk, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the retina, the terminals were located in the outermost IPL and partially entered the innermost INL (Figures d and c), which was in the in vitro tracings (Figure ) identified by Parvalbumin‐positive amacrine cells (Fischer & Stell, ; Hamano et al, ; Sanna et al, ) and retrogradely labeled displaced ganglion cells (Karten, Fite, & Brecha, ; Wilson et al, ). Interestingly, in Neognathae only the convergent ION terminals have been described to enter the INL (Dowling & Cowan, ; Lindstrom et al, ; Ramón y Cajal, ), while the divergent ones remain in the IPL (Chmielewski et al, ; Dogiel, ; Fritzsch et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations