2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10577-022-09696-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centromere drive: model systems and experimental progress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we propose that innovation in the CENP-O C-terminal RWD domain modulates interactions with other centromeric components (possibly CENP-Q and -U) necessary to form a stable CENP-OPQUR complex at centromeres (Foltz et al, 2006; Hori et al, 2008; Kagawa et al, 2014; Minoshima et al, 2005; Okada et al, 2006; Pesenti et al, 2018), potentially stabilizing kinetochore-microtubules to counteract destabilizing activities associated with driving centromeres (Akera et al, 2019; Wu et al, 2018). Future work using centromere drive models (reviewed in (Dudka and Lampson, 2022)) will be needed to experimentally test this idea. Overall, we show how FREEDA can help derive evolutionary hypotheses and guide experimental testing of functional innovation, starting from just a gene name, making it a powerful tool for incorporating evolutionary analyses into cell biology research and generating new insights into essential cellular processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we propose that innovation in the CENP-O C-terminal RWD domain modulates interactions with other centromeric components (possibly CENP-Q and -U) necessary to form a stable CENP-OPQUR complex at centromeres (Foltz et al, 2006; Hori et al, 2008; Kagawa et al, 2014; Minoshima et al, 2005; Okada et al, 2006; Pesenti et al, 2018), potentially stabilizing kinetochore-microtubules to counteract destabilizing activities associated with driving centromeres (Akera et al, 2019; Wu et al, 2018). Future work using centromere drive models (reviewed in (Dudka and Lampson, 2022)) will be needed to experimentally test this idea. Overall, we show how FREEDA can help derive evolutionary hypotheses and guide experimental testing of functional innovation, starting from just a gene name, making it a powerful tool for incorporating evolutionary analyses into cell biology research and generating new insights into essential cellular processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses provide a starting point for future experiments probing the functional impacts of innovation, including testing whether positive selection reduces fitness costs associated with centromere drive (reviewed in (Dudka and Lampson, 2022)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hypothesis that heterozygous females would transfer more Rb chromosomes to their offspring than males arises from findings in different organisms (de Villena and Sapienza, 2001;Fishman and Saunders, 2008;Presgraves, 2009;Dudka and Lampson, 2022). In addition, segregational asymmetry is difficult to explain in males, whereas in female meiosis, such asymmetry is possible because the chromosomes that eventually remain in the oocyte can be inherited, while those that remain in the polocytes are necessarily lost (Lindholm et al, 2016).…”
Section: Animalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One powerful model system for assessing the molecular basis for female meiotic drive is the mouse ( 15 ). Prior work has demonstrated that major differences in the abundance of repetitive centromere DNA between inbred laboratory strains or species lead to differences in which chromosomes are more likely to be inherited through meiosis ( 15 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%