1996
DOI: 10.1006/excr.1996.0082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centromeres Reposition to the Nuclear Periphery during L6E9 Myogenesisin Vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reversion of malignant HMECs in 3D culture is accompanied by the establishment of features of higher order nuclear structure Concentration of heterochromatin at the nucleolar and/or nuclear periphery and formation of enlarged splicing factor speckles are nuclear features of differentiation in several cell types, including mammary epithelial cells (Manuelidis, 1985;Antoniou et al, 1993;Chaly and Munro, 1996;Lelièvre et al, 1998;Martou and De Boni, 2000;Gribbon et al, 2002;Beil et al, 2002;Garagna et al, 2004;Abad et al, 2007). To assess whether features of nuclear organization that are characteristic of mammary acinar differentiation are lost in breast cancer cells, we cultured non-neoplastic S1 cells (Briand et al, 1987) and S1-derived malignant T4-2 cells (Briand et al, 1996) in Matrigel TM in 3D for 10 days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reversion of malignant HMECs in 3D culture is accompanied by the establishment of features of higher order nuclear structure Concentration of heterochromatin at the nucleolar and/or nuclear periphery and formation of enlarged splicing factor speckles are nuclear features of differentiation in several cell types, including mammary epithelial cells (Manuelidis, 1985;Antoniou et al, 1993;Chaly and Munro, 1996;Lelièvre et al, 1998;Martou and De Boni, 2000;Gribbon et al, 2002;Beil et al, 2002;Garagna et al, 2004;Abad et al, 2007). To assess whether features of nuclear organization that are characteristic of mammary acinar differentiation are lost in breast cancer cells, we cultured non-neoplastic S1 cells (Briand et al, 1987) and S1-derived malignant T4-2 cells (Briand et al, 1996) in Matrigel TM in 3D for 10 days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peripheral repositioning of centromeres is the most common structural change associated with differentiation in human and mouse cell types (Chaly and Munro, 1996;Bá rtová et al, 2001;Harničarová et al, 2006). Wiblin et al (2005) reported that the proportion of centromeres located close to the nuclear periphery in hESCs is smaller than that in highly differentiated B-cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have already dealt with the description of centromere localization and distribution in mammalian cells during interphase (18,22,36,37). One of the few studies on centromere distributions in 3D was published by Martou and De Boni (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During postnatal development of mice, dynamic clustering processes of centromeres associated with various stages of differentiation were demonstrated in Purkinje cells (21). A centromere repositioning to the nuclear periphery was observed during L6E9 myoblast differentiation (22). Although several studies already characterized various aspects of centromere localization and clustering, no quantitative approach has yet been used to evaluate global patterns of the spatial centromere distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%