2014
DOI: 10.4161/cc.28896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrosomes at M phase act as a scaffold for the accumulation of intracellular ubiquitinated proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent analysis using microarrayed Tyr(P) peptides representing confirmed and theoretical phosphorylation motifs from the cellular proteome, identifies more than 130 potential CDC25B substrates ( Zhao et al, 2015 ). These substrates are implicated in microtubule dynamics, signalling pathways like Delta/Notch or Wnt, transcription, epigenetic modifications, mitotic spindle or proteasome activity ( Zhao et al, 2015 ), and several of them could play a role in INM or cell fate choice ( Akhtar et al, 2009 ; Aubert et al, 2002 ; Das and Storey, 2012 ; Götz and Huttner, 2005 ; Hämmerle and Tejedor, 2007 ; Jiang and Hsieh, 2014 ; Kimura et al, 2014 ; Li et al, 2012 ; MuhChyi et al, 2013 ; Olivera-Martinez et al, 2014 ; Sato et al, 2004 ; Schwartz and Pirrotta, 2007 ; Vilas-Boas et al, 2011 ). Further work will be necessary to dissect the molecular pathway linking CDC25B with INM and to determine whether this link is causal in neurogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent analysis using microarrayed Tyr(P) peptides representing confirmed and theoretical phosphorylation motifs from the cellular proteome, identifies more than 130 potential CDC25B substrates ( Zhao et al, 2015 ). These substrates are implicated in microtubule dynamics, signalling pathways like Delta/Notch or Wnt, transcription, epigenetic modifications, mitotic spindle or proteasome activity ( Zhao et al, 2015 ), and several of them could play a role in INM or cell fate choice ( Akhtar et al, 2009 ; Aubert et al, 2002 ; Das and Storey, 2012 ; Götz and Huttner, 2005 ; Hämmerle and Tejedor, 2007 ; Jiang and Hsieh, 2014 ; Kimura et al, 2014 ; Li et al, 2012 ; MuhChyi et al, 2013 ; Olivera-Martinez et al, 2014 ; Sato et al, 2004 ; Schwartz and Pirrotta, 2007 ; Vilas-Boas et al, 2011 ). Further work will be necessary to dissect the molecular pathway linking CDC25B with INM and to determine whether this link is causal in neurogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depletion of the endogenous proteasome inhibitor Ecm29 86 led to a significant reduction in polyubiquitinated proteins at the centrosome, supporting the view that these substrates may be actively degraded by centrosomal proteasomes. 87 While proteasomal activity is roughly the same between S-phase and M-phase centrosomes, centrosomal targeting of polyubiquitinated proteins increases during maturation, demonstrating that other substrates may share this mode of division-coupled regulation. Together, these studies suggest that centrosome-associated degradation strategies control various signaling factors during mitotic divisions, linking pathway activity to the cell cycle.…”
Section: Centrosome-associated Degradation Of Cell Fate Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent analysis using microarrayed Tyr(P) peptides representing confirmed and theoretical phosphorylation motifs from the cellular proteome, identifies more than 130 potential CDC25B substrates (Zhao et al, 2015). These substrates are implicated in signalling pathways like Delta/Notch or Wnt, in microtubule dynamics, transcription, epigenetic modifications, mitotic spindle or proteasome activity (Zhao et al, 2015), and all of them could play role in cell fate choice (Akhtar et al, 2009; Aubert, Dunstan, Chambers, & Smith, 2002; Das & Storey, 2012; Gotz & Huttner, 2005; Hammerle & Tejedor, 2007; Jiang & Hsieh, 2014; Kimura, Miki, & Nakanishi, 2014; Li et al, 2012; MuhChyi, Juliandi, Matsuda, & Nakashima, 2013; Olivera-Martinez et al, 2014; Sato, Meijer, Skaltsounis, Greengard, & Brivanlou, 2004; Schwartz & Pirrotta, 2007; Vilas-Boas, Fior, Swedlow, Storey, & Henrique, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%