CEO dominance and firm innovation effort

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate whether innovation effort is lower for firms exhibiting signs of higher chief executive officer (CEO) dominance and whether such CEOs can be incentivized to pursue risky ventures such as innovation projects in line with shareholder's interests that are geared toward the long-term growth of the firm.Design/methodology/approachThe paper utilizes panel data of US publicly listed companies (2007–2016) to address the influence of CEO dominance on firm innovation effort and the moderating effects of incentives in this relationship through ordinary least squares (OLS) estimations. A two-stage least squares (2SLS) technique is also employed to address possible endogeneity. As a robustness check, further analysis is conducted utilizing an alternative proxy for CEO incentive as well as Tobit analysis (with panel-level random effects).FindingsResults from both OLS and Tobit estimations offer two key findings. First, there is a significantly negative relationship between CEO pay slice and firm research and development (R&D) intensity. Second, the interaction effect of CEO incentives and CEO dominance is significant and positive.Research limitations/implicationsWhen provided with the right incentives, such as those that reward long-term performance, dominant CEOs can be incentivized to go after risky ventures like innovation projects that are crucial to promoting the long-term growth of the firm.Originality/valueThis paper utilizes R&D instead of patent outputs as proxies for innovation where the former enables studying R&D efforts for more recent periods compared to prior studies that utilize patent data.

Role of green financing and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in technological innovation and corporate environmental performance: a COVID-19 perspective

“…The questionnaire of technological innovation was adopted by the Souitaris (2002), where researchers tested technological innovation with company specific competencies in Greece context. Later on, many other researchers considered this questionnaire with innovation patterns (Zhang et al , 2019), director's effectiveness (Hakovirta et al , 2020), socioeconomic paradigms (Rupčić, 2020) and CEO dominance (Prugsamatz, 2021). We used five-point Likert type scale to measure corporate environmental performance.…”

The impact of environmental innovation and national culture on ESG practices: a study of Latin American companies

“…In addition, technological advancements have led companies to seek innovative solutions for their development and survival in competitive and dynamic environments (E-Vahdati and Binesh, 2021). Thus, companies seek and develop resources that differentiate them, with innovation as one of the possibilities, as observed by Prugsamatz (2021).…”

“…Alternatively, companies can become "more sustainable" through their ability to innovate (Barbieri et al, 2010), as these organizations become part of a competitive scenario driven mainly by the speed of technological change (Quintana-Garc ıa et al, 2022). Considering this, innovation has become essential for the sustainable growth of organizations and is understood as the implementation of science and technology in business activities (Kim et al, 2018) in order to obtain advantages and growth prospects (Prugsamatz, 2021).…”

CFO gender in curbing CEO dominance on overpriced acquisition premiums

“…According to these researchers, a CEO who exerts himself or herself as a powerful influencer will be able to sway directive decisions that may otherwise be a collaborative effort among the high-level managers of the company. Building on prior research (Haleblian and Finkelstein, 1993; Brown and Sarma, 2007; Prugsamatz, 2021), we define CEO dominance as the ability of the individual to impose his or her personal viewpoint upon others.…”