2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
152
0
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
16
152
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results tie in with a growing literature on corporate governance and performance that demonstrate that in the presence of ambiguous empirical results, contextual factors and contingencies, such as ownership, competition and institutional factors could matter in determining the effectiveness of any governance mechanism (Desender et al 2013;Yang and Zhao 2014;Peng et al 2007). With regard to bank ownership that provides us with the specific context in this paper, our findings of differential effects of board independence, CEO duality and CEO tenure across ownership groups suggest that the results pertaining to the performance impact of such governance mechanisms on private sector banks cannot be necessarily applied to state-owned banks.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results tie in with a growing literature on corporate governance and performance that demonstrate that in the presence of ambiguous empirical results, contextual factors and contingencies, such as ownership, competition and institutional factors could matter in determining the effectiveness of any governance mechanism (Desender et al 2013;Yang and Zhao 2014;Peng et al 2007). With regard to bank ownership that provides us with the specific context in this paper, our findings of differential effects of board independence, CEO duality and CEO tenure across ownership groups suggest that the results pertaining to the performance impact of such governance mechanisms on private sector banks cannot be necessarily applied to state-owned banks.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In the empirical literature it is customary to control for these factors to avoid any spurious relation between the dependent variable and the variables of interest. Following existing literature (Berger et al 2010;Liang et al 2013;Faleye and Krishnan 2017) and the unique regulatory requirements of bank lending in India (Sarkar et al 1998;Bhaumik and Dimova 2004;Yang and Zhao 2014), we use a number of conditioning variables in our regression. These variables include (i) Log Assets, measured by the logarithm of total assets, to proxy for bank's market power and other lending characteristics; (ii) Loans to Assets, measured by the percentage of loans and advances to total assets, to account for possible differences in business models across banks and (ii) Priority Sector Lending, measured by the percentage of priority sector lending to total loans and advances, to proxy for the extent of government intervention in bank lending with potential effects on bank outcomes.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Yang and Zhao (2014) the separation of post of CEO and the Chairman of the Board is one of the most debatable corporate governance issues in recent years. The Board of directors will define duties to Chairman and CEO, whether these are the same or separate.…”
Section: Ceo Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, many other studies found the CEO duality has a positive effect on firm performance under certain circumstances. For instance, Yang and Zhao (2012) revealed that firms with CEO duality outperform the firms without CEO duality. Moreover, the study has uncovered the advantages of CEO duality in saving information costs and making speedy decisions (Yang & Zhao, 2012).…”
Section: Ceo Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Yang and Zhao (2012) revealed that firms with CEO duality outperform the firms without CEO duality. Moreover, the study has uncovered the advantages of CEO duality in saving information costs and making speedy decisions (Yang & Zhao, 2012). Nonetheless, the research of CEO duality in SMEs context is very rare in corporate governance literature.…”
Section: Ceo Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%