1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00814.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceo Locus of Control and Small Firm Performance: an Integrative Framework and Empirical Test*

Abstract: Previous research on the impact of chief executive officer (CEO) locus of control is mainly based on simple and partial mappings of bivariate associations between CEO locus of control and organizational outcomes. In addition, distinct substreams have emerged in which intricately related phenomena are studied separately. to overcome this fragmentation and polarization, we provide and empirically test an integrative framework based on previously tested hypotheses on the impact of CEO locus of control. Our approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
1
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
5
98
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Dans la documentation sur le management, on accorde un rôle important à l'entrepreneur dans l'explication des différences de croissance entre les entreprises (Finkelstein et Hambrick, 1990 ;Boone, de Brabander et Van Witteloostijn, 1996). Dans ce contexte, le capital humain de l'entrepreneur joue un rôle central.…”
Section: Aspects Théoriques De La Croissance Des Entreprisesunclassified
“…Dans la documentation sur le management, on accorde un rôle important à l'entrepreneur dans l'explication des différences de croissance entre les entreprises (Finkelstein et Hambrick, 1990 ;Boone, de Brabander et Van Witteloostijn, 1996). Dans ce contexte, le capital humain de l'entrepreneur joue un rôle central.…”
Section: Aspects Théoriques De La Croissance Des Entreprisesunclassified
“…People with an external locus of control (externals, or external individuals) tend to feel like pawns in a complicated environment governed by forces outside their own control, whereas internals feel they are active masters of their own fates. Experimental and field studies have indeed shown, time and again, that internals are much more likely and more motivated than externals to use all their faculties to understand and influence their surroundings, as doing so heightens the probability of successfully regulating behavior (for a reviews, see Boone et al [1996] and Lefcourt [1982]). Not surprisingly, research has demonstrated that internals generally perform better than externals not only in experimental tasks, but also in many achievement-related domains, such as career track and education (Andrisani & Nestel, 1976;Lefcourt, 1982;O'Brian, 1984).…”
Section: The Impact Of Mean Team Internalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, control perceptions appear to be very salient in explaining effective management. Specifically, research into the relationship between CEO locus of control and organizational performance consistently shows that firms led by CEOs who are internals perform better than firms headed by those who are externals, both in the short and the long run (Boone, De Brabander & Hellemans, 2000;Boone, De Brabander, & Van Witteloostuijn, 1996;Miller & Toulouse, 1986). In the present study, we hypothesize on the effects of both the mean and dispersion of this characteristic in teams on information acquisition behavior, which we consider to be a mediating variable in explaining team performance differences.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other scholars argue that different, more specific personality constructs are useful as well, or even more useful, for work-related research because hypotheses with respect to work-related outcomes can be specified in greater detail when using specific personality constructs (Robertson, 1994). A number of specific personality constructs have gained substantial credibility in the area of work-related studies, prominent examples being 'locus of control' (Boone, De Brabander, & Van Witteloostuijn, 1996), 'type A behavior' (Tett et al, 1991), 'sensation seeking' (Van den Berg, 1992), and 'self-monitoring' (Kilduff & Krackhardt, 1994). These constructs are often mentioned in handbooks and textbooks of organizational behavior (e.g., Robbins, 1996), having a solid research history.…”
Section: Personality Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%