2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1343818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CEO Risk Taking and Firm Policies: Evidence from CEO Employment History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the above‐mentioned literature has its merits, critics argue that CEOs’ previous static characteristics and employment histories may not be a good measure to predict CEO talent and risk preference in the current employer firm. Wang () finds no difference in long‐run accounting performance for CEOs with different employment histories. Therefore, the most fundamental personal characteristic, an individual's preference for bearing risk, is still difficult to measure empirically, and this represents a gap in our understanding of the relationship between managerial risk‐taking and firm risk/performance.…”
Section: Related Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the above‐mentioned literature has its merits, critics argue that CEOs’ previous static characteristics and employment histories may not be a good measure to predict CEO talent and risk preference in the current employer firm. Wang () finds no difference in long‐run accounting performance for CEOs with different employment histories. Therefore, the most fundamental personal characteristic, an individual's preference for bearing risk, is still difficult to measure empirically, and this represents a gap in our understanding of the relationship between managerial risk‐taking and firm risk/performance.…”
Section: Related Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, prior literature has used managerial personal characteristics (such as age, personal income, wealth, education and gender) to estimate managerial risk aversion (e.g., Bajtelsmit & Bernasek, ; Donkers, Melenberg, & Van Söest, ; Grable, ; Wang & Hanna, ). However, critics argue that firm history and previous CEO characteristics are irrelevant and may not be a good proxy of talent and risk preferences in their current employment environment (Wang, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%