2020
DOI: 10.55230/mabjournal.v49i5.1644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CEPHALOPHARYNGEAL SKELETONS OF Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 1794) (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE) THIRD INSTAR LARVAE DISPLAYED RESISTANCE TO HOT-WATER KILLING METHOD – IMPLICATIONS IN FORENSIC ENTOMOLOGY PRACTICE

Abstract: -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since forensic entomology practice mainly deals with specimens stored in preservatives, such as in 70-95% ethanol (Amendt et al, 2007), it is imperative to observe variations of size caused by the effect of preservatives on the larval body and how it differs from cephalopharyngeal skeleton. Furthermore, the rigid sclerites of the cephalopharyngeal skeleton could potentially provide a better estimation of PMI min than highly flexible larval body length which was prone to physical distortions due to killing procedure and preservation effects (Tantawi & Greenberg, 1993;Adams & Hall, 2003;Rosilawati et al, 2014;Abdullah & Zuha, 2020;Zuha, 2021). Even so, the prospect of using cephalopharyngeal skeleton as an alternative growth indicator to larval body length relies on the sample representation across different ages and instars, including differing outcomes when using other species than C. megacephala as experimental subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since forensic entomology practice mainly deals with specimens stored in preservatives, such as in 70-95% ethanol (Amendt et al, 2007), it is imperative to observe variations of size caused by the effect of preservatives on the larval body and how it differs from cephalopharyngeal skeleton. Furthermore, the rigid sclerites of the cephalopharyngeal skeleton could potentially provide a better estimation of PMI min than highly flexible larval body length which was prone to physical distortions due to killing procedure and preservation effects (Tantawi & Greenberg, 1993;Adams & Hall, 2003;Rosilawati et al, 2014;Abdullah & Zuha, 2020;Zuha, 2021). Even so, the prospect of using cephalopharyngeal skeleton as an alternative growth indicator to larval body length relies on the sample representation across different ages and instars, including differing outcomes when using other species than C. megacephala as experimental subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%