CERAMBYCIDAE Leach 1815

Turnbow, Robert H.; Thomas, Michael C.

doi:10.1201/9781420041231.ch8

Cited by 21 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Semiochemical treatments were altered among years 2000, 2001, and 2002-2003 Adult subcortical insects were identified by K.J.K.G. with taxonomic keys (Middlekauff 1960;Linsley 1962aLinsley , b, 1963Linsley , 1964Linsley and Chemsak 1972;Nelson 1975;Bright 1976Bright , 1987Wood 1982b, Triplehorn 1990Goulet 1992;Chemsak 1996;Downie and Arnett 1996;Yanega 1996;Kovarick and Caterino 2001;Bellamy and Nelson 2002;Optiz 2002;Pollack 2002;Turnbow and Thomas 2002) and with the assistance of systematists. Specifically, reference collections of buprestid, cerambycid, clerid, histerid, scolytid, and tenebrionid beetles and siricid wasps were verified by C. Bellamy (California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento) and G. Nelson (College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, deceased); (Holsten et al 2000); Ips pini (Teale et al 1991); Dendroctonus rufipennis (Borden et al 1996); Dendroctonus simplex (Werner et al 1981); Dendroctonus valens ; and Dryocoetes spp.…”

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Semiochemicals to Assess the Biodiversity of Subcortical Insects following an Ecosystem Disturbance in a Sub-boreal Forest

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From 2000 through 2003 we used semiochemicalbaited traps in northeastern Minnesota, USA, to assess changes in assemblages of subcortical forest insects after a catastrophic wind storm in 1999 and subsequent (1999)(2000) fuel-reduction activities (salvage-logging and prescribed-burning). We determined the regional efficacy of fifteen semiochemical blends (pheromones and kairomones) as attractants for target and non-target subcortical insect species (Coleoptera: Anthribidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Cleridae, Cucujidae, Curculionidae, Histeridae, Nemonychidae, Salpingidae, Scolytidae, Tenebrionidae, and Hymenoptera: Siricidae we trapped 86,471 subcortical insects (143 species) in baited and unbaited Lindgren funnel traps, and 500 beetles (44 species) in baited and unbaited pitfall traps. We report 23 new state collection records of subcortical insects from Minnesota. Trap catches of subcortical insects were greatest in the wind-disturbed areas 2 years after the event, and declined thereafter. Similar trends were observed for subcortical insects in the burned areas. Both wind-disturbance and burning increased the subcortical insect species richness and diversity on the landscape. The subcortical insect species compositions of the salvaged and burned forest areas differed from those of the undisturbed and wind-disturbed areas. Trap catches of subcortical insects in response to semiochemical treatments also varied with year of sampling and land-area treatment. The greatest diversity of subcortical beetle species was in traps baited with attractants for the scolytids, Dendroctonus valens [(+)-α-pinene and (−)-β-pinene] and Dryocoetes spp. [exo-brevicomin and (−)-α-pinene], perhaps reflecting the generic nature of the baits. The most distinct species compositions were collected in response to the woodborer and Dendroctonus simplex baits, whereas the species compositions in traps with the D. valens and Dryocoetes spp. baits, and the unbaited funnel trap were the most similar. The variation in trap catch with time and across landscapes suggests that the responses of subcortical insects to semiochemicals are more complex than previously appreciated.

show abstract

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Semiochemicals to Assess the Biodiversity of Subcortical Insects following an Ecosystem Disturbance in a Sub-boreal Forest

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Because they are almost exclusively phytophagous, many of these beetles are important to humans, mainly as plant pests or biological agents against unwanted plants. The families Cerambycidae (longhorn beetles) and Chrysomelidae (leaf beetles) are by far the largest in this superfamily and include worldwide more than 20,000 (Turnbow et al 2002) and 38,000 (Jolivet 1997) species, respectively. Reid (2000) recently reviewed phylogenetic analyses of the chrysomeliform lineage and provided a key to subfamilies based on adults and larvae.…”

Section: Series Cucujiformiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Biodiversity of Coleoptera

Bouchard

Grebennikov

Smith

et al. 2009

Insect Biodiversity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Marinoni (1977: 40). Comment: This family-group name has not been used as valid name for a particular taxon after 1899 and Hemilophini has been used as the valid name for this group in the following 27 publications, published by more than ten authors in the immediately preceding 50 years and encompassing a span of more than ten years: Lane (1966Lane ( , 1976, Martins and Galileo (1993, 1996, 2004c, Linsley and Chemsak (1995), Monné (1995bMonné ( , 2005b, Galileo and Martins (1996, 1997a, 1997b, 2001a, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, Martins (1998b), Hua (2002), Turnbow and Thomas (2002), Peck (2005), Nearns et al (2006), Monné and Bezark (2009 Thomson (1864: 121).…”

Section: Tribe Batocerini Thomson 1864mentioning

confidence: 99%

Catalogue of family-group names in Cerambycidae (Coleoptera)

Bousquet

Heffern²,

Bouchard

et al. 2009

Zootaxa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Family-group names proposed for beetles belonging to the family Cerambycidae are catalogued and their availability is determined using the rules of the current International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. A synoptic classification of the family summarizes the validity of the names. Type genera of all family-group names are listed and the type species and stems of genera of available family-group names are included. A new family-group name, Elytracanthinini Bousquet (type genus: Elytracanthina Monn, 2005, a replacement name for Elytracantha Lane, 1955) is proposed for Elytracanthinae Lane, 1955. Ichthyosoma armatum Montrouzier, 1855 is designated as type species of Icthyosoma Boisduval, 1835. Reversal of precedence is used to preserve the validity of the following family-group names: Anaglyptides Lacordaire, 1868 (over Anaglyptisidae Gistel, 1848 [Buprestidae]); Dryobiini Arnett, 1962 (over Dryobiadae Gistel, 1856 [Ptinidae]); Hemilophitae Thomson, 1868 (over Amphionychitae Thomson, 1860) and Hétéropsides Lacordaire, 1869 (over Dichophyiaeidae Gistel, 1848). The following family-group names, although junior synonyms, are preserved as valid until an application is submitted to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature; in these cases a reversal of precedence could not be applied: Eurypodini Gahan, 1906 (over Zaracinae Pascoe, 1869); Macronides Lacordaire, 1868 (over Enchapteritae Thomson, 1861); Pyresthides Lacordaire, 1868 (over Pseudolepturitae Thomson, 1861 and Erythrinae Pascoe, 1866) and Stenoderinae Pascoe, 1867 (over Syllitae Thomson, 1864). A total of 238 valid cerambycid family-group names (413 available names) are recognized in the following 13 subfamilies: Vesperinae (1 valid family-group name), Oxypeltinae (1), Disteniinae (4), Anoplodermatinae (3), Philinae (1), Parandrinae (2), Prioninae (24), Spondylidinae (5), Necydalinae (1), Lepturinae (8), Lamiinae (80), Dorcasominae (1), and Cerambycinae (107).

show abstract

CERAMBYCIDAE Leach 1815

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

Application of Semiochemicals to Assess the Biodiversity of Subcortical Insects following an Ecosystem Disturbance in a Sub-boreal Forest

Application of Semiochemicals to Assess the Biodiversity of Subcortical Insects following an Ecosystem Disturbance in a Sub-boreal Forest

Biodiversity of Coleoptera

Catalogue of family-group names in Cerambycidae (Coleoptera)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About