Ceramic Membrane Distillation for Desalination

Tai, Zhong Sheng; Aziz, Mustafa Kamal Abdul; Othman, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan; Dzahir, Mohd Irfan Hatim Mohamed; Hashim, N. Awanis; Koo, Khong Nee; Hubadillah, Siti Khadijah; Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi

doi:10.1080/15422119.2019.1610975

Cited by 39 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 244 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The excellent filtration performance of inorganic membranes, as stated in Table 4, indicates the capacity of ceramic membranes for most water purification applications, and the low acceptance of inorganic membranes in the past is because of the sheer dominance of polymeric RO and NF membranes in large-scale water treatment systems. Recent research on preparation of advanced inorganic membranes such as free-standing CNTs membranes and interlayer free membranes enables efficient filtration process with better purification performance and lower facility cost [8,162]. According to Weschenfelder et al, the operation expense and total cost of a water treatment plant using ceramic membranes with a flow rate of 2 m/s and water recovery rate of 95% are US $0.23/m 3 and US $3.21/m 3 , respectively [163].…”

Section: Challenges and Future Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review on Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes for Water Purification

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable and affordable supply of clean, safe, and adequate water is one of the most challenging issues facing the world. Membrane separation technology is one of the most cost-effective and widely applied technologies for water purification. Polymeric membranes such as cellulose-based (CA) membranes and thin-film composite (TFC) membranes have dominated the industry since 1980. Although further development of polymeric membranes for better performance is laborious, the research findings and sustained progress in inorganic membrane development have grown fast and solve some remaining problems. In addition to conventional ceramic metal oxide membranes, membranes prepared by graphene oxide (GO), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and mixed matrix materials (MMMs) have attracted enormous attention due to their desirable properties such as tunable pore structure, excellent chemical, mechanical, and thermal tolerance, good salt rejection and/or high water permeability. This review provides insight into synthesis approaches and structural properties of recent reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes which are used to retain dissolved species such as heavy metals, electrolytes, and inorganic salts in various aqueous solutions. A specific focus has been placed on introducing and comparing water purification performance of different classes of polymeric and ceramic membranes in related water treatment industries. Furthermore, the development challenges and research opportunities of organic and inorganic membranes are discussed and the further perspectives are analyzed.

show abstract

Section: Challenges and Future Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review on Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes for Water Purification

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In contrast to UV studies carried out previously, they tested if low fluences are sufficient to not only delay the biofilm formation but further lead to a reduced hydraulic resistance of the biofilm while approaching a severe biofouling state. On the other hand, the development of ceramic membranes for membrane distillation desalination is developing, gradually replacing their polymeric counterparts due to superior properties in terms of thermal, chemical, and mechanical stabilities, as well as potentially longer service terms [41]. Bandar et al [42] used economically and eco-friendly Saudi red clay, tetraethyl orthosilicate, ammonia, and sodium alginate powder as a binder to fabricate a ceramic membrane for membrane distillation using an extrusion technique.…”

Section: Conventional Thermal Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Emerging Technologies for Seawater Desalination: Northern Chile as A Case Study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this work was to study different desalination technologies as alternatives to conventional reverse osmosis (RO) through a systematic literature review. An expert panel evaluated thermal and membrane processes considering their possible implementation at a pilot plant scale (100 m3/d of purified water) starting from seawater at 20 °C with an average salinity of 34,000 ppm. The desalination plant would be located in the Atacama Region (Chile), where the high solar radiation level justifies an off-grid installation using photovoltaic panels. We classified the collected information about conventional and emerging technologies for seawater desalination, and then an expert panel evaluated these technologies considering five categories: (1) technical characteristics, (2) scale-up potential, (3) temperature effect, (4) electrical supply options, and (5) economic viability. Further, the potential inclusion of graphene oxide and aquaporin-based biomimetic membranes in the desalinization processes was analyzed. The comparative analysis lets us conclude that nanomembranes represent a technically and economically competitive alternative versus RO membranes. Therefore, a profitable desalination process should consider nanomembranes, use of an energy recovery system, and mixed energy supply (non-conventional renewable energy + electrical network). This document presents an up-to-date overview of the impact of emerging technologies on desalinated quality water, process costs, productivity, renewable energy use, and separation efficiency.

show abstract

“…These advantages allow CHFM to attain long service time without frequent breakdown [1,2]. Moreover, the hollow fiber membrane configuration consisting of shell and tube sides has high packing density with a large permeation area when it is assembled in a membrane module, offering high productivity at low energy consumption [3,4]. Today, the majority of CHFM in the market are fabricated from high-purity alumina.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently, the combined phase inversion and sintering methods have attracted popularity for the fabrication of CHFM [7,18,19]. This method enables asymmetric structured CHFM to be produced in a single step with one heat treatment session only [3,20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%