2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceramic monolith as microfiltration membrane: Preparation, characterization and performance evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Figure 10(b) shows that the flexural stress values of the tubes treated at 25°C, 550°C, 750°C, 950°C and 1150°C are 1.1 ± 0.1, 2.6 ± 0.3, 4.3 ± 0.6, 7.8 ± 0.8 and 15.7 ± 0.9 MPa, respectively. Accordingly, the mechanical strength of the support membrane improved significantly with the increase in the treating temperature, and consequently the mechanical strength relating to 1150°C was considerably higher than others, even higher than other porous ceramics with similar porosities reported in the literature [20]. This finding most likely results from phase transformation as explained previously (see section 3.2).…”
Section: Mechanical Strengthsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, Figure 10(b) shows that the flexural stress values of the tubes treated at 25°C, 550°C, 750°C, 950°C and 1150°C are 1.1 ± 0.1, 2.6 ± 0.3, 4.3 ± 0.6, 7.8 ± 0.8 and 15.7 ± 0.9 MPa, respectively. Accordingly, the mechanical strength of the support membrane improved significantly with the increase in the treating temperature, and consequently the mechanical strength relating to 1150°C was considerably higher than others, even higher than other porous ceramics with similar porosities reported in the literature [20]. This finding most likely results from phase transformation as explained previously (see section 3.2).…”
Section: Mechanical Strengthsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In confirmation, Arzani et al [20] showed that with the increase in the porosity and pore size of the ceramic membrane structure, its mechanical strength was weakened. Besides, Terpstra et al [36] demonstrated that the finger-like structure could be considered as a defect formed by the agglomeration of ceramic particles and lack of de-airing, which lowered the mechanical strength as a consequence.…”
Section: Mechanical Strengthmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 11 highlights the other polymeric materials. Besides polymers, several non-organic materials were identified, either as monolithic membranes [33] or mixed matrix membranes (MMM), with ceramic nanoparticles embedded within a polymer matrix [32]. SiO2 (8.7%) and Al2O3 (7.8%) were the main non-organic MF membrane materials with the others shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Waste Water Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dar estructura y forma cristalina bien definida a los materiales porosos se lleva a cabo con la adición de compuestos inorgánicos con fases cristalográficas estables [16][17][18]. Por tal razón, en la síntesis del material se adiciona carbonato de calcio (CaCO3), uno de los minerales más abundantes en la corteza terrestre producido por organismos vivos a través del proceso conocido como biomineralización [19].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified