2022
DOI: 10.3390/ma15144899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Augmentation: Design and Characterization with SEM and Confocal Microscopy

Abstract: Bone scaffolds must fulfil numerous and sometimes contradictory characteristics: biocompatibility, bioactivity, high porosity, and appropriate mechanical strength. To tackle some of these issues, this study has several aims for the development of such scaffolds for dentistry applications: (i) to utilize appropriate materials (ceramics and sponges) and to introduce a novel, potentially performant ceramic material; (ii) to characterize the obtained scaffolds by using a range of methods; (iii) to compare and to c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of the present report is to highlight some of the issues, methods, and obtained results in utilizing both machine vision methods and AI in approaching the problem of false positive results in the quality control of the above-mentioned products. This is in line with a larger direction of work in our group in collaboration with our industrial partners, regarding product quality assessment using a range of imaging methods, including scanning electron microscopy [1], Xray imaging [2], micro-CT [3], optical coherence tomography (OCT) [4][5][6][7], and confocal microscopy [8]. Applications approached so far included metallic fractures [9,10], electronic boards [11], polymers [12], as well as dental materials of different types [13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The aim of the present report is to highlight some of the issues, methods, and obtained results in utilizing both machine vision methods and AI in approaching the problem of false positive results in the quality control of the above-mentioned products. This is in line with a larger direction of work in our group in collaboration with our industrial partners, regarding product quality assessment using a range of imaging methods, including scanning electron microscopy [1], Xray imaging [2], micro-CT [3], optical coherence tomography (OCT) [4][5][6][7], and confocal microscopy [8]. Applications approached so far included metallic fractures [9,10], electronic boards [11], polymers [12], as well as dental materials of different types [13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Additionally, electrospinning conditions such as flow rate, voltage, temperature and injector-collector distance have to be taken into account [ 5 ]. As for the characterization of porous materials, conventional techniques like mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), X-ray diffraction, centrifugal porosimetry and nitrogen sorption porosimetry (NSP), among others, are based on physical methods that try to represent the totality of the sample [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. With the use of the MIP and NSP techniques, it is very likely that the membrane be destroyed at high pressures, for the pores are not rigid enough, given the characteristics of the electrospun veils [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though conventional tests are employed in the early phases of a material’s development, a postmarket information system that allows dentists to report adverse effects should be added to the biocompatibility assessment [ 1 ]. The introduction of novel materials and techniques [ 2 , 3 , 4 ], as well as the advancement of CAD/CAM (computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing) technology, have significantly altered the clinical workflow in the field of dentistry, leading to new concepts for evaluation and dental treatment [ 5 ]. The CAD/CAM technique has the great advantage of reducing production time and achieving transposed and perfectly adapted structures [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%