2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebellar Inhibitory Input to the Inferior Olive Decreases Electrical Coupling and Blocks Subthreshold Oscillations

Abstract: GABAergic projection neurons in the cerebellar nuclei (CN) innervate the inferior olive (IO) that in turn is the source of climbing fibers targeting Purkinje neurons in the cerebellar cortex. Anatomical evidence suggests that CN synapses modulate electrical coupling between IO neurons. In vivo studies indicate that they are also involved in controlling synchrony and rhythmicity of IO neurons. Here, we demonstrate using virally targeted channelrhodopsin in the cerebellar nucleo-olivary neurons that synaptic inp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
132
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
15
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not know the source of this extra synchrony or the mechanisms that modulate it during sensory stimulation. However, we note that electrical coupling of cells in the inferior olive (IO) plays an important role in synchronizing CF activity (De Zeeuw et al, 1997; Blenkinsop and Lang, 2006; Van Der Giessen et al, 2008), and that the coupling coefficient can be dynamically modulated up and down via stimulus-related activation of synaptic inputs to the IO (Llinás and Sasaki, 1989; Lang, 2002; Lefler et al, 2014; De Gruijl et al, 2014b). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not know the source of this extra synchrony or the mechanisms that modulate it during sensory stimulation. However, we note that electrical coupling of cells in the inferior olive (IO) plays an important role in synchronizing CF activity (De Zeeuw et al, 1997; Blenkinsop and Lang, 2006; Van Der Giessen et al, 2008), and that the coupling coefficient can be dynamically modulated up and down via stimulus-related activation of synaptic inputs to the IO (Llinás and Sasaki, 1989; Lang, 2002; Lefler et al, 2014; De Gruijl et al, 2014b). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the IO, these membrane potential oscillations are thought to rely on interactions between neurons connected by gap junctions. The properties of these gap junctions, and hence the interactions between neurons in the IO, in turn depend on activation of glutamatergic NMDA receptors (Mathy et al, 2014), as well as GABAergic input from the CN (Lefler et al, 2014). We observed oscillations in simple and complex spike activity in 5 of 12 cells after the CS (Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Lefler et al [••39] have recently examined the mechanism through which GABAergic projections from the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) transiently decouple IO neurons. The arrangement of IO dendritic spines in glomeruli containing electrical synapses surrounded by inhibitory and excitatory terminals (Figure 4) prompted Llinas to propose 40 years ago that synaptic activation could transiently decouple IO neurons through shunting inhibition [40].…”
Section: Timing Is Everythingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arrangement of IO dendritic spines in glomeruli containing electrical synapses surrounded by inhibitory and excitatory terminals (Figure 4) prompted Llinas to propose 40 years ago that synaptic activation could transiently decouple IO neurons through shunting inhibition [40]. Lefler et al [••39] tested this hypothesis using optogenetic stimulation of GABAergic neurons from the DCN that project to the IO. Light pulses produced inhibitory currents in IO neurons with slow time courses, which merged into steady sustained inhibitory currents during trains of pulses.…”
Section: Timing Is Everythingmentioning
confidence: 99%