2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep36191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebellar theta burst stimulation modulates the neural activity of interconnected parietal and motor areas

Abstract: Voluntary movement control and execution are regulated by the influence of the cerebellar output over different interconnected cortical areas, through dentato-thalamo connections. In the present study we applied transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) to directly assess the effects of cerebellar theta-burst stimulation (TBS) over the controlateral primary motor cortex (M1) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in a group of healthy volunteers. We found a TBS-dependent bidirection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
92
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
16
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have reported N100 to be associated with GABA B -mediated inhibitory mechanisms in both motor (Bonnard et al, 2009;Farzan et al, 2013;Premoli, Rivolta, et al, 2014b;Rogasch, Daskalakis, et al, 2013a) and prefrontal cortex (Chung et al, 2017;Rogasch et al, 2015). The amplitude of N100 increased following SAI both in motor and prefrontal cortex (Noda et al, 2016;Noda, Zomorrodi, Backhouse, et al, 2017c), but decreased following cerebellar iTBS (Casula, Pellicciari, Ponzo, et al, 2016b), which are in line with the change observed in N100 following Ind iTBS. However, our previous studies showed increased N100 following prefrontal iTBS (50 Hz at 5 Hz) (Chung et al, 2017;Chung, Rogasch, Hoy, & Fitzgerald, 2018a;Chung, Rogasch, Hoy, Sullivan, et al, 2018b), and the discrepancy of the outcome…”
Section: Effect Of Individualised Itbs On Plastic Effects In the Prsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies have reported N100 to be associated with GABA B -mediated inhibitory mechanisms in both motor (Bonnard et al, 2009;Farzan et al, 2013;Premoli, Rivolta, et al, 2014b;Rogasch, Daskalakis, et al, 2013a) and prefrontal cortex (Chung et al, 2017;Rogasch et al, 2015). The amplitude of N100 increased following SAI both in motor and prefrontal cortex (Noda et al, 2016;Noda, Zomorrodi, Backhouse, et al, 2017c), but decreased following cerebellar iTBS (Casula, Pellicciari, Ponzo, et al, 2016b), which are in line with the change observed in N100 following Ind iTBS. However, our previous studies showed increased N100 following prefrontal iTBS (50 Hz at 5 Hz) (Chung et al, 2017;Chung, Rogasch, Hoy, & Fitzgerald, 2018a;Chung, Rogasch, Hoy, Sullivan, et al, 2018b), and the discrepancy of the outcome…”
Section: Effect Of Individualised Itbs On Plastic Effects In the Prsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It is interesting to note that cerebellar iTBS resulted in the opposite changes in N100 in two separate studies using 50 Hz (Casula, Pellicciari, Ponzo, et al, 2016b) and It is interesting to note that cerebellar iTBS resulted in the opposite changes in N100 in two separate studies using 50 Hz (Casula, Pellicciari, Ponzo, et al, 2016b) and…”
Section: Inter-individual Variability In the Response To Conventionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This modular organization means that TBS stimulation to different subregions will result in similar effects across distinct networks (Farzan 2016). Indeed, there has been investigation within the motor system of the effect of TBS, which is consistent with iTBS resulting in a change in distal motor cortex plasticity (Casula et al 2016; Koch et al 2008; Grimaldi et al, 2014). In the motor system, the cerebellum may contain an internal model predicting the course of future events based on past experience (Manto et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These parameters might have led to these opposite effects, as would be predicted by our network model of the stimulation effects (Halko et al, 2014). Others have reported reaction time changes and motor physiological changes from the application of TBS to the cerebellum, typically 1cm inferior and 3cm lateral to the inion (Koch et al, 2008, 2009; Picazio et al, 2016; Casula et al 2016). These motor sites are substantially superior and lateral to the typical dorsal attention network site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%