2014
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebellum, temporal predictability and the updating of a mental model

Abstract: We live in a dynamic and changing environment, which necessitates that we adapt to and efficiently respond to changes of stimulus form ('what') and stimulus occurrence ('when'). Consequently, behaviour is optimal when we can anticipate both the 'what' and 'when' dimensions of a stimulus. For example, to perceive a temporally expected stimulus, a listener needs to establish a fairly precise internal representation of its external temporal structure, a function ascribed to classical sensorimotor areas such as th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
10
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore suggest that its involvement in the present study was built during the sensorimotor training process. However, since the mismatch measurements themselves do not involve motor behavior, our results suggest that the cerebellum contributes to prediction not only of motor actions but also of sensory sequences, consistent with recent findings from sensory and motor timing studies (Kotz et al, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We therefore suggest that its involvement in the present study was built during the sensorimotor training process. However, since the mismatch measurements themselves do not involve motor behavior, our results suggest that the cerebellum contributes to prediction not only of motor actions but also of sensory sequences, consistent with recent findings from sensory and motor timing studies (Kotz et al, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, our results are consistent with recent work implicating cerebellum in sequence learning (e.g. serial reaction task) (Dirnberger et al, 2013;Tzvi et al, 2014) and predictive processing (Kotz et al, 2014;Leggio and Molinari, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This idea could provide a plausible explanation to previous studies showing that while deviant sounds embedded in task-relevant and non-task-relevant organizations elicit a change detection signal, only those marked as targets in the attended organization elicit a P3b auditory evoked potential (Sussman et al 2014). Although change detection is considered a pervasive property of the auditory system (Escera and Malmierca 2014), P3 component neural sources relate to those identified as the executive control system (Eichele et al 2005) and to predictive processing of temporal structure such as the cerebellum (Kotz et al 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%