1999
DOI: 10.1006/exnr.1998.6983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral Astrocyte Response to Micromachined Silicon Implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

37
507
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 536 publications
(546 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
37
507
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We are able to release 0.5 µg/cm 2 Dex after each CV cycle and to a total of nearly 16 µg/cm 2 after 30 CV cycles. Based on most of the histological studies, the reactive region indicated by enhanced glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a key intermediate filament, activity around the neural electrode arrays has a radius of less than 500 µm [7,48]. A release of 0.5 µg/cm 2 Dex will result in average Dex concentration of 1 µM within 500 µm radius from the electrode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We are able to release 0.5 µg/cm 2 Dex after each CV cycle and to a total of nearly 16 µg/cm 2 after 30 CV cycles. Based on most of the histological studies, the reactive region indicated by enhanced glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a key intermediate filament, activity around the neural electrode arrays has a radius of less than 500 µm [7,48]. A release of 0.5 µg/cm 2 Dex will result in average Dex concentration of 1 µM within 500 µm radius from the electrode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chronic application of these devices has been limited by their unpredictable failure over extended periods. Although the precise mechanism for this failure is not completely known, it is suggested that an undesirable brain tissue reaction to the device leads to the formation of a glial scar which then serves as a barrier to neural signal transduction [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At a cellular level, it has been shown that activated, proliferating microglia appear around the implant site as early as 1-day post implantation [18,21,42]. These activated microglia are thought to gradually diminish both excess fluid and cellular debris 6 -8 days after the implant, although necrotic tissue has been observed up to 42 days later [41,44]. At later time points, typical inflammatory cells or hemorrhaging has not been observed [47], while others have documented neuronal cell loss and macrophages up to 112 days after the implant [6,41,42,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These activated microglia are thought to gradually diminish both excess fluid and cellular debris 6 -8 days after the implant, although necrotic tissue has been observed up to 42 days later [41,44]. At later time points, typical inflammatory cells or hemorrhaging has not been observed [47], while others have documented neuronal cell loss and macrophages up to 112 days after the implant [6,41,42,44]. As a testament to the transitory nature of this mechanically induced wound healing response, electrode tracks could not be found in animals after several months when the electrode was inserted and quickly removed [6,13,35,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%