2022
DOI: 10.3390/cells11142254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral Autoregulation Assessment Using the Near Infrared Spectroscopy ‘NIRS-Only’ High Frequency Methodology in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: Impairments in cerebral autoregulation (CA) are related to poor clinical outcome. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a non-invasive technique applied to estimate CA. Our general purpose was to study the clinical feasibility of a previously published ‘NIRS-only’ CA methodology in a critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) population and determine its relationship with clinical outcome. Bilateral NIRS measurements were performed for 1–2 h. Data segments of ten-minutes were used to calculate transfer function a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from having its own potential clinical prognostic values in varying disease states, rSO 2 has also shown to be an effective metric for measuring changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The non-invasive nature of NIRS devices reduces the difficulty of implementation compared to invasive cerebral hemodynamic monitoring methods like intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring [ 24 ]. Despite these benefits, NIRS data streams are particularly rife with artifacts due to patient motion [ 9 , 11 ] pads falling off, and signal distortion due to hematomas [ 25 ] or other cerebral tissue [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from having its own potential clinical prognostic values in varying disease states, rSO 2 has also shown to be an effective metric for measuring changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The non-invasive nature of NIRS devices reduces the difficulty of implementation compared to invasive cerebral hemodynamic monitoring methods like intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring [ 24 ]. Despite these benefits, NIRS data streams are particularly rife with artifacts due to patient motion [ 9 , 11 ] pads falling off, and signal distortion due to hematomas [ 25 ] or other cerebral tissue [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of CA using NIRS-only methodology seems feasible in critically ill sedated/coma patients after incorporating methodological improvements. As the authors of the article [ 26 ] state, the NIRS-only methodology has the advantage that it is non-invasive and does not require monitoring of arterial blood pressure. However, the method has not yet entered into practice and requires further validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%