2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral revascularization using cadaveric vein grafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Our preliminary report on the use of cadaveric SVGs in cerebral revascularization surgery noted a 100% short-term graft patency rate. 19 In the present analysis, at a median follow-up of 2.2 months (IQR 0.2-29.1), 13 (86.7%) of 15 cadaveric SVGs were patent compared with 26 (68.4%) of 38 autologous SVGs (p = 0.30), and Kaplan-Meier estimates showed no difference in the bypass patency rate over time between SVG types (p = 0.58). In addition, of the 13 cadaveric SVGs patent beyond the 1st postoperative day, 13 (100%) were patent at the last follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 Our preliminary report on the use of cadaveric SVGs in cerebral revascularization surgery noted a 100% short-term graft patency rate. 19 In the present analysis, at a median follow-up of 2.2 months (IQR 0.2-29.1), 13 (86.7%) of 15 cadaveric SVGs were patent compared with 26 (68.4%) of 38 autologous SVGs (p = 0.30), and Kaplan-Meier estimates showed no difference in the bypass patency rate over time between SVG types (p = 0.58). In addition, of the 13 cadaveric SVGs patent beyond the 1st postoperative day, 13 (100%) were patent at the last follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Preliminary outcome data from 3 (20.0%) of the 15 cadaveric cases have been previously reported. 19 Bypass procedures were performed for the purpose of either flow augmentation for steno-occlusive atherosclerotic disease (14 cases) or flow replacement during complex aneurysm (38 cases) or tumor (1 case) surgery. Between autologous and cadaveric SVG recipients, there were no statistically significant differences in age (p = 0.50), sex (p > 0.99), history of smoking (p = 0.75), hypertension (p > 0.99), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.13), or indication for bypass (p = 0.27; Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the integrity of the vein wall is damaged, on the basis of the size of the defect, methods for definitive repair include wrapping, microsuture, venous reconstruction using the silicone tubing technique or saphenous vein bypass graft, and vein anastomosis. 1,[15][16][17][18][19][20] However, all of these procedures are not useful for collapsed veins with uninjured walls. In these circumstances, a profuse irrigation with isotonic saline solution may be useful to rehydrate the vein wall in order to restore its normal diameter.…”
Section: First Of All Force and Duration Of Brain Retraction Should mentioning
confidence: 99%