2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceria nanostructured catalysts for conversion of methanol and carbon dioxide to dimethyl carbonate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Urakawa et al reported that the addition of rare earth metals (La, Gd, and Pr) can effectively enhance the catalyst stability by improving the methoxy species adsorption strength while preventing the adsorption of 2-picolinamide-like species, as shown in Figure c . Compared with pure CeO 2 , doping metals such as Zr, Zn, or Ti into CeO 2 enhances the catalytic activity via increasing oxygen vacancy concentration and promoting the surface acid–base sites, ,, whereas the CeO 2 nanorods doped with NiO, CuO, and CoO or CaO showed a worse catalytic activity than pure CeO 2 nanorods with the (110)-dominated surface structures . The authors claimed that doping NiO, CuO, CaO, and CoO would lower the ceria (110) surface area and reduce the oxygen vacancy density, and thus, the reaction preferred to occur at the more thermodynamically stable (100) plane.…”
Section: Organic Synthesis Using Co2 As a Carbon Feedstockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Urakawa et al reported that the addition of rare earth metals (La, Gd, and Pr) can effectively enhance the catalyst stability by improving the methoxy species adsorption strength while preventing the adsorption of 2-picolinamide-like species, as shown in Figure c . Compared with pure CeO 2 , doping metals such as Zr, Zn, or Ti into CeO 2 enhances the catalytic activity via increasing oxygen vacancy concentration and promoting the surface acid–base sites, ,, whereas the CeO 2 nanorods doped with NiO, CuO, and CoO or CaO showed a worse catalytic activity than pure CeO 2 nanorods with the (110)-dominated surface structures . The authors claimed that doping NiO, CuO, CaO, and CoO would lower the ceria (110) surface area and reduce the oxygen vacancy density, and thus, the reaction preferred to occur at the more thermodynamically stable (100) plane.…”
Section: Organic Synthesis Using Co2 As a Carbon Feedstockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e FTIR spectra for the HPW and HPW@CoCeO were also characterized to illustrate the HPW had been embedded in the CoCeO framework, and the results are presented in Figure 2. e strong spectra at 750 cm −1 were ascribed to the Ce-O bonds [29], and the spectra in the range of 500-580 cm −1 were assigned to the Co-O bonds [30]. Moreover, the absorption peak corresponding to Keggintype HPW emerged at 982 cm −1 , 889 cm −1 , and 801 cm −1 assigned to W-O, W-O b -W, and W-O c -W, respectively [31].…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, Al-Darwish et al recently found that a CeO 2 catalyst with an octahedral morphology presented a higher DMC yield (0.4%) than that of the cube (0.2%) because of its higher surface area (23 m 2 g −1 for the octahedron, and 8 m 2 g −1 for the cube). 103…”
Section: Strategies For the Improvement Of Direct Dmc Synthesis From Co2 And Methanolmentioning
confidence: 99%