2018
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201801150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceric Ammonium Nitrate and Ceric Ammonium Chloride as Precursors for Ceric Siloxides: Ammonia and Ammonium Inclusion

Abstract: Treatment of ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN) with sodium tris(tert‐butoxy)siloxide in THF afforded crystalline complexes [Ce{OSi(OtBu)3}3(NO3)(NH3)2(THF)] and [Ce{OSi(OtBu)3}4(NH3)2] featuring strong ammonia coordination. Conducting the CAN/NaOSi(OtBu)3 (1:4) reaction in acetonitrile gave ceric ate complex [Ce{OSi(OtBu)3}3(NO3)2(NH4)(NCCH3)] where the ammonium cation is embedded in the siloxy ligand sphere via hydrogen bonding. Salt‐metathetic conversion of ceric organo(R)ammonium hexachlorides (CACR, R = Me, Et)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(189 reference statements)
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solid-state structure (Figure ) indicates a distorted-octahedral geometry around the Ce IV centersboth metals are coordinated by two phenolate oxygens, three trimethylsiloxide ligands, and a single pyridine molecule. The average Ce–O phenolate distance (2.220 Å) is slightly longer than the average Ce IV –O siloxide distance (2.158 Å), but both are well within the range of literature Ce IV –O distances reported. ,,, Specifically, the subset of average Ce–siloxide distances match very well with comparable six-coordinate complexes: e.g., 2.151 Å in [Ce­{OSi­(O t Bu) 3 } 4 (NH 3 ) 2 ] and 2.143 Å in [Ce­(OMe)­{OSi­(O t Bu) 3 } 3 (THF) 2 ] . The chelate angle of the TP ligand (O1–Ce1–O2) is 85.4° in 1*- p -Ad , which is slightly narrower than in similar TP complexes reported recently by us: the average O–M–O angle is 90.4° in [Ce IV 2 ( p TP t ) 2 (THF) 4 ], 89.0° in [{Ce III Cl­(py) 4 } 2 ( p TP t )], and 91.3° in [{U IV I 2 (THF) 2 } 2 ( p TP t )]. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The solid-state structure (Figure ) indicates a distorted-octahedral geometry around the Ce IV centersboth metals are coordinated by two phenolate oxygens, three trimethylsiloxide ligands, and a single pyridine molecule. The average Ce–O phenolate distance (2.220 Å) is slightly longer than the average Ce IV –O siloxide distance (2.158 Å), but both are well within the range of literature Ce IV –O distances reported. ,,, Specifically, the subset of average Ce–siloxide distances match very well with comparable six-coordinate complexes: e.g., 2.151 Å in [Ce­{OSi­(O t Bu) 3 } 4 (NH 3 ) 2 ] and 2.143 Å in [Ce­(OMe)­{OSi­(O t Bu) 3 } 3 (THF) 2 ] . The chelate angle of the TP ligand (O1–Ce1–O2) is 85.4° in 1*- p -Ad , which is slightly narrower than in similar TP complexes reported recently by us: the average O–M–O angle is 90.4° in [Ce IV 2 ( p TP t ) 2 (THF) 4 ], 89.0° in [{Ce III Cl­(py) 4 } 2 ( p TP t )], and 91.3° in [{U IV I 2 (THF) 2 } 2 ( p TP t )]. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The proligands H 4 ( m TP t ) and H 4 ( p TP t ) (Chart ) have been reported previously; the adamantyl derivatives H 4 ( m TP Ad ) and H 4 ( p TP Ad ) and the terphenyl proligand H 4 ( mTer TP t ) are new and were synthesized in an analogous manner (see section S2.1 in the Supporting Information). We find that “Ce­(OSiR 3 ) 4 ” made in situ , as described recently by Anwander and co-workers from [NH 4 ] 2 [Ce­(NO 3 ) 6 ] or [NEt 4 ] 2 [CeCl 6 ], provides a clean, one-pot route to the target catalysts (Scheme ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the initial successful salt-metathetical exchange between chlorido species Cp′ 3 CeCl and KO t Bu disclosed a new approach toward ceric alkoxy derivatives . Alkoxy and siloxy ligands are known to strongly stabilize the cerium­(IV) center, as evidenced by a broad variety of homoleptic ceric alkoxides and siloxides. The robust redox-insensitive siloxy ligands OSi­(O t Bu) 3 and OSiPh 3 even allowed for the isolation of molecular terbium­(IV) and praseodymium­(IV) complexes. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%